Chisle
The coding-agent plugin that bills 52% of a bare model across 20 live tasks. Terse persona + tool-output compressor + context diet.
翻訳待ち
ASC is a super FAST Android decompiler front-end designed for Agents/Mobile Researchers.
翻訳待ち
開発ツールPython · CGitHub @MG1937自分でインストール所有者未確認
Paste into Claude or ChatGPT for installation instructions suited to your environment.
Have you tried it? One tap is enough. No sign-in needed.
Loading the full README. The saved excerpt is shown below.
Droid ASC: R8 Compiler Optimization as a DeCompiler Primitive https://blackhat.com/europe/arsenal/schedule/index.html#droid-asc-r8-compiler-optimization-as-a-decompiler-primitive-54834Read the full README ↗
Rust version: This project has been rewritten 1:1 in Rust as rust_ASC. The Rust version is 10× faster and supports full APK decompilation: with 16 threads, it decompiles a 383 MB APK in just 4 seconds.
If your workflow is written in Python, you can continue integrating with this project; it remains the fastest Python Android decompiler available. If you only need a binary, please use rust_ASC.
ASC and rust_ASC will be maintained in parallel, so users can choose the integration style that best fits their workflow.
When decompiling massive Android APKs, the standard procedure is to wait. We wait for tools to eat gigabytes of RAM, fully inflate the artifacts, and spend tens of minutes building heavy global indexes and cross references... All of this is just to guarantee fast code searches later, but here is the contradiction. A compiled artifact is already highly structured, modern decompilers never utilize this, they waste massive amounts of time and memory reconstructing a bloated database of code relationships over already structured data. This engineering approach defies common sense. When I can directly extract any code relationship from the APK in milliseconds, does this preprocessing still hold any value?
Instead of forcing decompilers into heavy preprocessing, we choose to query the compiled artifact directly as a database. We built a stateless, zero-overhead engine that extracts and searches code on demand in milliseconds. In this briefing, we will explore the underlying engineering required to bypass traditional bottlenecks. We will demonstrate how to abandon full inflate by probing directly within the Deflate bitstream, building dense Huffman lookup tables to extract core metadata without touching irrelevant data blocks. Furthermore, we will explain optimization details of the R8 compiler, especially how deterministic constant relocation and instruction deduplication leave behind highly concentrated physical layouts, we weaponize this compiler behavior to execute lightning-fast cross DEX code searches. To map these raw bytecode offsets back to methods, we engineered an O(1) instruction locating primitive, achieving constant-time method resolution without building heavy mapping tables. Finally, upon hitting a target, Droid ASC extracts only the specific bytecodes and its dependencies, dynamically reconstructing a minimal and self consistent DEX entirely in memory for instant decompilation.
We will demonstrate this architecture live against a 352MB commercial APK. Droid ASC executes global cross reference searches in 1.79 seconds and decompiles target classes in 177 milliseconds using only 141MB of RAM. By treating the artifact as a read only database and operating with zero preprocessing, we return the decompiler to its core essence. It is no longer a bloated indexing tool, but a lightning fast, on demand decompilation engine that fundamentally redefines how we analyze compiled code.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c4a6813-8561-490c-a573-ef113da861b6
Raw absolute values, measured with 10 threads across four APK targets of increasing size:
Global string xref search
| Tool | TelegramX (59MB) | WhatsApp (130MB) | Grab (228MB) | Lark (352MB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASC | 322ms | 418ms | 806ms | 1.597s |
| JADX | 20s | 32s | 2m14s | 8m2s |
ASC is 62x to 302x faster than JADX for global string xref search.
Single-class decompile
| Tool | TelegramX (59MB) | WhatsApp (130MB) | Grab (228MB) | Lark (352MB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASC | 157ms | 141ms | 165ms | 303ms |
| JADX | 6s | 15s | 37s | 1m32s |
ASC is 38x to 304x faster than JADX for single-class decompile.
CLI memory usage
| Tool | TelegramX (59MB) | WhatsApp (130MB) | Grab (228MB) | Lark (352MB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASC | 36MB | 36MB | 58MB | 141MB |
| JADX | 1,016MB | 2.1GB | 7.1GB | 13.2GB |
ASC uses 28x to 125x less memory than JADX for CLI operation.
Disk cache usage
| Tool | TelegramX (59MB) | WhatsApp (130MB) | Grab (228MB) | Lark (352MB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASC | 0MB | 0MB | 0MB | 0MB |
| JADX | 119MB | 30MB | 127MB | 322MB |
ASC stays fully in memory with zero disk cache, while JADX writes up to 322MB.
Note: JADX runs out of memory on the largest target (Lark) during the global search (~49% searched), while ASC completes every target.
As the benchmark shows, ASC is 62x faster than JADX on ~50MB APKs, and 302x faster on ~300MB APKs, with a tiny memory footprint. Agents can pair with ASC to analyze dozens or even hundreds of APKs at once, even on weak machines. The JADX MCP has a harder time here: JADX alone uses several GB just to preload, which makes switching between hundreds of APKs impractical.
# from PyPI
pip install droidasc
# or from source
pip install .
After installation, the droidasc CLI command is available globally:
This is the beginning of the README. Read the rest at the original. Read the full README ↗