bama
BAMA: Build Any Mac App. Agent skills to research, clone, design, build, optimize, and test native macOS apps with Swift and SwiftUI.
翻訳待ち
Claude Code skill: four-phase plan hardening (recon, interrogate, Codex adversarial review, cross-model build & inspection) — two AI models harden your plan before a line of code exists, then swap job
翻訳待ち
スキルPythonGitHub @chaseai-yt自分でインストール所有者未確認
Paste into Claude or ChatGPT for installation instructions suited to your environment.
Have you tried it? One tap is enough. No sign-in needed.
No updates detected yet. GitHub releases will appear here.
Claude Code skill: four-phase plan hardening (recon, interrogate, Codex adversarial review, cross-model build & inspection) — two AI models harden your plan before a line of code exists, then swap jobs to build it. Whoever built it never grades it.
翻訳待ち
Loading the full README. The saved excerpt is shown below.
Skills for working across Claude Code and Codex.
This repository contains separate skills for choosing a model, making a one-off handoff, and running a complete development workflow. They share a repository and plugin distribution; Claudex Route is independent of the Claudex Loop workflow.Read the full README ↗This repository contains separate skills for choosing a model, making a one-off handoff, and running a complete development workflow. They share a repository and plugin distribution; Claudex Route is independent of the Claudex Loop workflow.
| Skill | Use it for | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|
claudex-route | A model recommendation or one scoped handoff | Self-contained; selected CLI needed only for delegation |
claudex-loop | Requirements, plan review, implementation, and final inspection | Both CLIs and Python 3.10+ |
codex-review | Explicit Codex plan-review compatibility command | Shared claudex-loop skill |
codex-build | Explicit Codex builder compatibility command | Shared claudex-loop skill |
Claudex Loop gives a plan an independent review before implementation, then gives the code an independent inspection. Your current conversation handles requirements and coordination; the other provider challenges the plan with concrete evidence. The host arbitrates findings, records decisions, and keeps the loop bounded.
| Start here | Requirements and plan | Plan review | Default build | Final inspection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | Current Claude session | Codex | Claude | Fresh Codex session |
| Codex | Current Codex session | Claude | Codex | Fresh Claude session |
Choose either builder with builder=claude or builder=codex. The inspector follows the builder choice and always uses the other provider. If the coordinator takes over fixes, those new edits need another independent inspection. With mixed authorship, the log records who wrote and reviewed each part.
Model choices remain configurable. Use Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra when selected and available on your accounts, or retain each CLI's configured model. The host UI selection does not automatically change the other CLI's configuration. Requested and observed model information is recorded separately, and there is no silent model/provider fallback.
Use claudex-route when you want help choosing who should handle a task. It recommends a model and a role with a short reason: stay with the current agent, get a second opinion on a plan or implementation, investigate a blocker, or delegate a bounded task. It can perform one handoff when requested. Recommendations alone do not launch another model or authorize edits.
claudex-route: Who should handle this CSV import feature? Prioritize cost.
claudex-route: Recommend a second opinion on this plan before we build.
claudex-route: Pick a suitable model and have it diagnose this failing test read-only.
For example, Luna may suit a focused fixture-generation task, Sol a bounded implementation, and Astra or Fable a difficult review. These are task-fit recommendations, not a fixed ranking; available models, context, verification, and current pricing matter. Staying with your current model is a valid result. Route is a self-contained instruction skill with no Python dependency; a delegated run requires the selected CLI and account access. It does not use the full loop's approval-binding runner.
Claudex Route runs independently. Use Claudex Loop when you want repeated plan review, implementation, and independent inspection.
flowchart LR
R[Host scouts code and context] --> Q[Settle material decisions]
Q --> P[Write plan and acceptance checks]
P --> V[Other provider reviews]
V -- Revise --> A[Host arbitrates and updates]
A --> V
V -- Approved --> B[Authorized builder implements]
B --> T[Run proof checks]
T --> I[Other provider inspects final code]
I --> H[Present diff and remaining findings]
APPROVED, REVISE, or BLOCKED.The user controls consequential decisions and authorization. A request to review a plan does not authorize implementation. A request to plan and implement does not need redundant build approval. Commits, pushes and publication follow the user's existing instructions.
PLAN.md records what to build; PLAN-REVIEW-LOG.md records the findings, dispositions, models, proof and remaining uncertainty. Both paths are configurable. Detailed CLI diagnostics live in a unique directory outside the target checkout.
Both CLIs must be installed and authenticated for the full cross-provider workflow. Python 3.10+ runs the shared adapter; no runtime pip packages or separate API keys are required. Check codex --version, codex login status, claude --version and claude auth status. See the runtime reference for tested CLI versions and permission boundaries.
/plugin marketplace add chaseai-yt/claudex-loop
/plugin install claudex-loop@claudex-loop
This is the beginning of the README. Read the rest at the original. Read the full README ↗