Easy-to-manage touch screens
Free, open-source touch screens. Guided USB setup, a drag-and-drop editor and local control. Made for Home Assistant.
翻訳待ち
Organisiere deine Events stressfrei mit event4u! Buche Anreise und Unterkunft, teile Packlisten mit Freunden und finde dich mühelos auf Veranstaltungen zurecht. Exklusive Coupons inklusive!
翻訳待ち
暮らしTypeScript · JavaScriptGitHub @event4u-app直近の接続確認に失敗しました所有者未確認
Have you tried it? One tap is enough. No sign-in needed.
Every claim machine-checked, including "zero runtime daemon" — governed skills, rules and replayable state. One contract, every host agent.
翻訳待ち
Loading the full README. The saved excerpt is shown below.
Agent Config — every claim machine-checked, including the counts in these badgesRead the full README ↗
Installs into your user-level AI tool configuration; your repository only gets an agents/overrides/ folder for your own changes. Works with 20 AI coding tools.
Install once. Your AI coding tools are told to plan, test and verify before they say done; on Claude Code a turn that changed files without checking them can be stopped.
npx -y @event4u/agent-config init
Free and MIT-licensed. Node 22.6 or newer on macOS, Linux or WSL2. Costs more tokens: 7.8× a run with no rules on Claude Haiku as installed, 2.9× with only the core rules. What it costs →
On a desktop this opens a browser wizard: pick your role and your tools, click Finish. Nothing is written before you do.
Not ready to install anything? Drop one read-only checker into your repo and ask it whether your branch is really done:
mkdir -p .claude/agents
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/event4u-app/agent-config/main/docs/wedge/production-validator/production-validator.md \
-o .claude/agents/production-validator.md
# then in Claude Code: @production-validator check this branch is actually done
production-validator reads the code that would ship, hunts mocks and placeholders on that path and asks for proof that it ran. It changes nothing. What it checks →
Before. You ask your agent to add a CSV export. It writes a handler that returns a hard-coded placeholder, the existing tests stay green and it replies "Done — export implemented." Nothing ever ran the new code.
After. In Claude Code you ask @production-validator whether the branch is
really done. It reads the code that would ship, finds the placeholder and
answers NOT READY with the exact file and line. On a branch that is really
finished it answers READY and reports nothing. We tested this on two cases:
one with a placeholder left in, one finished.
On Claude Code the package can also refuse to let a turn end on "done" when the agent changed files and ran nothing to check them. On every other tool that is an instruction the agent is asked to follow, not a block.
| Default behavior | With agent-config |
|---|---|
| Guess and edit blindly | Analyze code before changing it |
| Drift from project conventions | Follow detected stack conventions |
| Skip or invent tests | Write tests in the project's framework |
| Generic commit messages | Conventional Commits with scope + ticket links |
| Skip quality checks | Run the project's quality pipeline and fix reported errors |
| Open PRs without context | Structured PR descriptions from Jira / Linear / GitHub |
| Claim "done" without proof | Verify with real execution before claiming done |
It changes what the agent is told to do, not how smart the model is. Re-measured in November 2026 after a scorer repair, the full install's discipline gain on Claude Haiku was not significant and Claude Sonnet showed no gain; only the small core rule set kept a significant gain on Haiku. We publish results like that one instead of hiding them. The whole story →
This is the beginning of the README. Read the rest at the original. Read the full README ↗