Outsider Stage 0.5
실제 봉인된 Outsider Stage 0.5 개입 체인을 재생하고 검증합니다
아직 감지된 업데이트가 없습니다. GitHub 릴리스가 나오면 여기에 보입니다.
개인 계정의 공개 저장소 소유자는 GitHub로 로그인해 운영자를 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다. 관리자 승인은 필요하지 않습니다.
로그인한 뒤 확인 파일을 만들어 이 저장소의 기본 브랜치에 30분 안에 커밋해 주세요. 다른 브랜치나 포크의 파일은 인정하지 않습니다. 파일을 올린 뒤 아래에서 확인하면 관리자 승인 없이 관리할 수 있습니다. 자격을 유지하려면 파일을 남겨 두세요.
로그인이 필요하면 로그인 화면으로 이동합니다. 로그인 후 이곳으로 돌아와 원하는 확인 버튼을 다시 눌러 주세요.
프로젝트 폴더에서 /nomorevibe verify를 실행하면 소유권을 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다.
1분 만에 확인하기Open-source attestation layer for AI API calls and research priority · AI 行为见证层
저장소 README에서 가져옴
README 전체를 불러오는 중입니다. 아래는 저장된 발췌입니다.
Your AI can do anything. Can you prove what it did? An open-source, independently verifiable evidence layer for AI API calls and research priority. July 2026. Elon Musk acknowledged that his AI company uploaded customers’ private code without consent. What if he had not admitted it? September 2026. Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge had privately worked for nearly a year on a blow-up solution to the Navier–Stokes equations, and uploaded an unpublished draft to OpenAI Codex for assistance. OpenAI then ran a large swarm of AI agents along the same obscure path and claimed the proof.README 전문 보기 ↗
English · 中文说明 →
Your AI can do anything. Can you prove what it did?
An open-source, independently verifiable evidence layer for AI API calls and research priority.
Live demo: ai-attestation.com · License: MIT
July 2026. Elon Musk acknowledged that his AI company uploaded customers’ private code without consent.
What if he had not admitted it?
September 2026. Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge had privately worked for nearly a year on a blow-up solution to the Navier–Stokes equations, and uploaded an unpublished draft to OpenAI Codex for assistance. OpenAI then ran a large swarm of AI agents along the same obscure path and claimed the proof.
The fight is not “who is better at math.” It is:
Today, AI companies’ behavior rests on self-attestation. They can see your data, call your APIs, and make decisions that hit your business — and no independent third party can audit what they actually did.
We built this. We shipped our first public version in September 2026.
A third-party attestation layer that does not depend on any AI vendor.
| Capability | What it does |
|---|---|
| API call attestation | Point your SDK base_url at our proxy. Every call appends a SHA-256 hash chain. Bodies are not stored. |
| Research priority deposit | Before you send a draft to any AI, hash it locally in the browser and write the fingerprint onto the chain. |
| Offline verify pack | One-click ZIP with verify.html. Works offline, on another machine, without our servers. |
| Public verify link | A URL a counterparty can open. Chain integrity, no login, no download. |
| Compliance as code | Open templates (EU AI Act, China’s Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services, and more), versioned and runnable. |
In one line: customers are not buying “we know AI better.” They are buying decision insurance — reconcile, replay, and let a third party verify when something goes wrong.
Attestation only works if it is open.
A closed audit tool cannot prove it did not tamper with the data. Code, algorithms, and verification methods have to be public, or a third party cannot independently recompute them.
Compliance templates and verification methods are MIT. The hosted product is the batteries-included path. If you do not trust us, fork it, run it, and verify it yourself.
This can support:
This cannot prove:
We would rather draw the line now than have you discover it in a fight.
ata_xxxxxx.from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://ai-attestation.com/v1/proxy",
api_key="sk-your-upstream-key", # DeepSeek / OpenAI / Anthropic / …
default_headers={
"X-Attest-Key": "ata_your_key",
},
)
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek-chat",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "hello"}],
)
verify.html.
No network, no login, no need to trust us.Without an upstream key, use Simulate a Call in the dashboard (POST /v1/demo/simulate).
# API — http://127.0.0.1:8004
cd backend/app
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
uvicorn main:app --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8004
# Dashboard — http://127.0.0.1:3002
cd frontend
npm install && npm run dev
Local proxy: http://127.0.0.1:8004/v1/proxy with header X-Attest-Key.
Optional env: ATA_HOME, ATA_SMTP_*, ATA_DASHBOARD_URL, ATA_UPSTREAM_*. See the source and SECURITY.md — do not expose an unmodified MVP to the public internet.
cd backend && PYTHONPATH=app python -m pytest tests/ -q
In September 2026, Terence Tao and fellow Fields Medalists launched SAIR Foundation's Open Math Model Initiative, which states three principles:
AI Behavior Attestation Layer provides the technical implementation for all three:
We are not affiliated with SAIR and do not replace its governance framework — we provide the "verifiable evidence" layer beneath it.
How is this different from LLMOps tools? LLMOps helps you debug and monitor your app. We are a vendor-independent third party: not OpenAI’s console, not Anthropic’s, not anyone’s. The hash chain can be recomputed offline by anyone. LLMOps is for your team. This is for customers, auditors, and counterparties.
Do you store our prompts and completions? No. API attestation stores hashes, not bodies. Research deposit is stricter: the browser hashes locally; only a 64-character fingerprint is uploaded.
Can a customer really verify without you?
Yes. The ZIP includes verify.html. Offline, another laptop, no our servers. Public verify links need no download.
Is this legally binding? We produce technical evidence and a timeline — not a legal opinion, and not a substitute for a notary. See Honest boundaries.
Can you prove OpenAI trained on our data? No, and we will not say that. We can show that you possessed some content at a point in time (fingerprint + timestamp), and that a call to a vendor happened (hash chain). Whether the vendor trained on it is a question for their logs and legal process.
If it is open source, why not just fork? You can. Templates and verification are MIT. Hosting is the “give a customer a link” path: no server, no verify page, no share-token ops. Fork to learn; use hosted when a counterparty needs a URL today.
Pricing? Open source is free. Hosted is trial / subscription. We are in a pilot.
Your SDK
│
▼
/v1/proxy ──► upstream (OpenAI / Anthropic / DeepSeek / Zhipu / …)
│
├─ hash only; no bodies
├─ SHA-256 chain: prev_hash → chain_hash
└─ unified evidence chain
│
▼
dashboard · compliance · offline pack · public verify URL
See CONTRIBUTING.md. We especially want:
Vulnerabilities: email, do not file a public issue. See SECURITY.md.
MIT © 2026 liao-zhizhi