Herdr UI
Herdr의 TUI가 뛰어나며, 창을 통해 추가되는 기능
AWS 뮌헨 시니어 솔루션 아키텍트 Andreas Nissen, 개인 AI 프로젝트·평가 방법·실용 아키텍처 가이드를 공유합니다
Andreas Nissen, Senior Solutions Architect at AWS in Munich. Explore personal AI projects, evaluation methods, and practical architecture guidance.
개발 도구HTML · PythonGitHub @Andreasniss온라인운영자 미확인
써 보셨어요? 한 번만 눌러 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없어요.
아직 감지된 업데이트가 없습니다. GitHub 릴리스가 나오면 여기에 보입니다.
개인 계정의 공개 저장소 소유자는 GitHub로 로그인해 운영자를 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다. 관리자 승인은 필요하지 않습니다.
로그인한 뒤 확인 파일을 만들어 이 저장소의 기본 브랜치에 30분 안에 커밋해 주세요. 다른 브랜치나 포크의 파일은 인정하지 않습니다. 파일을 올린 뒤 아래에서 확인하면 관리자 승인 없이 관리할 수 있습니다. 자격을 유지하려면 파일을 남겨 두세요.
로그인이 필요하면 로그인 화면으로 이동합니다. 로그인 후 이곳으로 돌아와 원하는 확인 버튼을 다시 눌러 주세요.
프로젝트 폴더에서 /nomorevibe verify를 실행하면 소유권을 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다.
1분 만에 확인하기A reusable AI SDLC skill for scoped changes, verification, and evidence-based review. Independently built from Anthropic’s official guidance and tested in two public projects.
저장소 README에서 가져옴
README 전체를 불러오는 중입니다. 아래는 저장된 발췌입니다.
A reusable, experimental skill that helps a coding agent turn a requested change into working code, relevant checks, and a reviewable delivery record. Start with the smallest process that preserves the decisions and evidence the next session needs. Humans retain product, architecture, risk, and release judgment.
Independently built from selected Anthropic AI-native SDLC guidance. This is the canonical source for the ai-sdlc-skill identifier, version 0.3.0.
Read the project article for three explanatory diagrams, a detailed file walkthrough, and the 7DayFocus worked example.README 전문 보기 ↗[!WARNING] I no longer recommend using this skill. My latest evaluation found it bought one extra accepted run in twelve on the harder cases for about 28% more median tokens, and on simple tasks it only added cost. Current models and harnesses do this work well from a repository's own instructions. The reasoning and results are in Does My AI Skill Still Earn Its Place?. This repository stays public as the record of the experiment.
Reusable instructions that help a coding agent carry a software change through implementation, checks, review and handoff.
Experimental, version 0.6.0. Test it against no skill before adopting it. In a small October comparison, the earlier full skill and no skill both completed 12/12 tasks; the full skill used 48.2% more median worker tokens. The current reduced edition has not been benchmarked. Methods and limits.
Only install it to reproduce or extend the comparison, never as your delivery workflow. From your project directory, with Node.js and npm available:
npx skills@latest add Andreasniss/ai-sdlc-skill \
--skill ai-sdlc-skill
Choose your coding assistant and installation scope. This installs from the default branch. Use the pinned installation to reproduce the reviewed reduced candidate, or the installation guide for other hosts and updates. Local installation does not install the skill into ChatGPT web or mobile.
In a disposable branch, choose a real documentation error and ask your agent:
Use AI SDLC Skill to fix this documentation example. Follow the repository rules. Report the skill file loaded, the change, checks run and remaining limits.
Inspect the diff and actual check results. Expected result: a scoped correction with honest verification, not a generated plan alone. This trial checks loading and behavior; it does not establish an advantage over no skill.
For the exact reviewed reduced candidate, follow the pinned checkout instructions. That historical pin does not include later README guidance. Existing installations are not updated automatically.
Try it when your agent loses accepted decisions, checks the wrong behavior, or leaves work that another session cannot continue. These are intended uses, not measured benefits.
For clear, authorized work, Auto can be sufficient. Use Plan mode to settle requirements or the approach first. Neither mode changes permissions or release authority.
The skill installs no hooks, grants no permissions and authorizes no release. Ordinary use runs your project's own checks. The optional Python helper records command results; it is not a sandbox or approval system.
The historical 20 October snapshot records 58 passing deterministic tests. Those checks cover helpers and bundle consistency, not model judgment, cross-host compatibility or productivity. Detailed evidence keeps the recorded revisions, comparisons and limitations together.
Read the project article for the lessons learned, or the experiment article for the measurements.
Follow CONTRIBUTING.md for checks and behavioral evaluation, and PRIVACY.md before public uploads. The optional plugin pilot packages the same skill. It has no public marketplace listing and does not update itself on startup.
Built by Andreas Nissen, with AI assistance. Andreas retains product, architecture, risk and release judgment. See sources and provenance for the Anthropic, Peter Steinberger and Matt Pocock influences. This independent project implies no employer or provider endorsement.
Copyright 2026 Andreas Nissen. Original code and technical documentation: Apache-2.0, except where indicated. See NOTICE; third-party material retains its own terms.