neuron-explorer
Qwen3.5‑4B 전용 조향형 뉴런 탐색기, 모든 MLP 뉴런을 밀어 결과를 보관·탐색
실험 실행·검증 가능한 주장·지식 그래프·기호 유도·맞춤 과학 피드, 완전 로컬 감사 가능한 연구 출처
Auditable research provenance, fully local: experiment runs, verifiable claims, a reading knowledge graph, symbolic derivations, and a personalized science feed.
개발 도구Python · Jupyter NotebookGitHub @mgoldey온라인운영자 미확인
써 보셨어요? 한 번만 눌러 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없어요.
개인 계정의 공개 저장소 소유자는 GitHub로 로그인해 운영자를 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다. 관리자 승인은 필요하지 않습니다.
로그인한 뒤 확인 파일을 만들어 이 저장소의 기본 브랜치에 30분 안에 커밋해 주세요. 다른 브랜치나 포크의 파일은 인정하지 않습니다. 파일을 올린 뒤 아래에서 확인하면 관리자 승인 없이 관리할 수 있습니다. 자격을 유지하려면 파일을 남겨 두세요.
로그인이 필요하면 로그인 화면으로 이동합니다. 로그인 후 이곳으로 돌아와 원하는 확인 버튼을 다시 눌러 주세요.
프로젝트 폴더에서 /nomorevibe verify를 실행하면 소유권을 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다.
1분 만에 확인하기Auditable research provenance as local-first MCP tools. The claim checker, paper feed, knowledge graph and symbolic math assume nothing about your field — any results JSON or CSV works, from any instrument. The experiment ledger adds W&B/MLflow/Sacred/DVC/Hydra for computational work. Nothing leaves the machine.
저장소 README에서 가져옴
README 전체를 불러오는 중입니다. 아래는 저장된 발췌입니다.
attestation makes research provenance auditable and fully local, for any
scientist who reads papers, keeps results files, and writes claims. It keeps
a personalised science feed and a knowledge graph built from what you read;
traces a number in your draft to the results file it came from and a
citation key to your bibliography; and does symbolic derivations — all
exposed to agents as MCP tools, with nothing leaving the machine.README 전문 보기 ↗attestation makes research provenance auditable and fully local, for any scientist who reads papers, keeps results files, and writes claims. It keeps a personalised science feed and a knowledge graph built from what you read; traces a number in your draft to the results file it came from and a citation key to your bibliography; and does symbolic derivations — all exposed to agents as MCP tools, with nothing leaving the machine. For computational work it adds an experiment ledger: it reads the runs you already have on disk (results files and W&B/MLflow/Sacred/DVC/Hydra directories) and ranks the arms of a sweep with caveats. The feed, provenance and symbolic tools assume nothing about your field; only the ledger assumes you run experiments.
No model server, no ingest, no config — the run ledger and claim checker are
pure local computation over files that already exist. This uses the sweep in
examples/workspace:
git clone https://github.com/mgoldey/attestation ~/attestation && cd ~/attestation && uv sync
export ATTEST_DB=/tmp/attest-demo.db
uv run attest runs scan --root examples/workspace
uv run attest runs compare kdsweep
uv run attest claims examples/workspace/speech-distill/FINDINGS.md
Measured at 0.94s total with no LLM backend reachable at all. What it says:
kdsweep — ranked by val_loss (lower_is_better), all arms on librispeech-100h
winner: kdsweep_t4
caveat: the top two arms differ by 0.03 (1.4%) -- too close to call from
these numbers alone
caveat: each arm is a single run; no seed replication, so this ranking
cannot separate configuration from run-to-run variance
7 claim(s): 1 contradicted, 5 supported, 1 unsupported
1 malformed
attest claims exits 1 on a contradiction (so it can gate a commit), which is
why a && chain stops there.
Every tracker ranks arms. The second caveat — this ranking cannot separate
configuration from noise — is the part that earns its keep, and the
contradicted verdict is a number in a document that no longer matches the
artifact it came from.
Three things for every scientist, one for computational experiments, and one way to use all of them:
For every scientist
results/ from
any instrument, script or spreadsheet export, not only a training run —
with one of five verdicts (supported, contradicted, unsupported,
ambiguous, stale), and lint a citation key against your BibTeX or
Zotero library. See
docs/guides/claims-and-citations.md.eval-ing input. See sym.* in
docs/guides/agents.md.For computational experiments
log_metric() calls — and ranks the
arms of a sweep with caveats rather than a silent
verdict. Five tracker layouts (W&B, MLflow, Sacred, DVC, Hydra) are read
as conventions of their own. This is the one part that assumes you run
experiments — though a plain results/ file is read the same way, so
the claim checker traces every number through it. See
docs/guides/ledger.md.From an agent
feed/provenance/knowledge/symbolic surfaces. See
docs/guides/agents.md and the repo's own
src/attestation/skills/ (seven skills: one per agent surface plus setup, plus two write-side skills, attestation-record and attestation-annotate).Two tiers. The run ledger and claim checker above need only Python 3.12+
and uv — no model, no download. The feed,
tagging, and knowledge graph additionally need Ollama
running locally; attest install then pulls ~7.8 GB of models
(gemma4:e2b-it-q4_K_M 7.2 GB + embeddinggemma 621 MB) and holds ~5.4 GB
resident while warm. Skip this tier entirely if you only want provenance.
uvx attestation install # from PyPI, nothing cloned; --check diagnoses only
No GPU? Point LLM_BASE_URL at an OpenAI-compatible endpoint; --check confirms
it answers. docs/guides/install.md: that tier,
prerequisites, and the manual steps attest install automates.
Once attest install has run and hermes-agent
is installed, the feed answers from a phone. Four steps, all outside this repo:
In the Discord Developer Portal create an application and a Bot, enable
the Server Members and Message Content intents on the Bot page,
and copy the token. Then hermes gateway setup, pick Discord, and paste
the token plus your own Discord user ID (not the bot's).
Allowlist the feed surface for chat in ~/.hermes/config.yaml, so each
turn carries 2 tool schemas instead of 131:
mcp_servers:
attestation-feed: {enabled: true} # attest install wrote the entry, disabled
platform_toolsets:
discord: [attestation-feed] # an MCP server here is an allowlist
systemctl --user restart hermes-gateway, then invite the bot with
https://discord.com/oauth2/authorize?client_id=<APP_ID>&scope=bot&permissions=274878286912
and DM it "What are your recommendations today?"
Measured on gemma4:e2b over a GTX 1080: a turn dropped from 54-249s at 15-29k prompt tokens to 23-28s at ~5k. The other half of that saving is keeping the model resident, since a cold load alone was 30s. Full recipe, Telegram variant, and the keep-alive timer in docs/guides/agents.md.
A golden path is a directory under examples/ with a README in seven fixed
sections, a run.sh that runs those README commands verbatim, and its own
inputs on disk — tests/test_golden_paths.py runs every one whose
prerequisite is none and pins a line of its output, so the docs are what
the suite asserts. examples/README.md is the full catalogue, with a runtime
for each. Fourteen paths, grouped by prerequisite:
None — pure local computation:
agents/ — the install doctor, attest emit's configs, one surface over stdiocitations/ — a BibTeX library, a draft, one citation key that resolves nowheredvc/ — a real dvc repro pipeline, four foreach arms rankedflows/ — forty items scored, every MCP tool over stdio, four MLflow armshydra/ — a real Hydra --multirun sweep, four arms rankedmlflow/ — a real MLflow directory, four arms, one contradicted claimmodel-servers/ — attest ingest/tag against an in-process stub servermolecular-ai/ — a molecular-AI library generated from real papers, synced, searched, walked by citation edge, graphedranking/ — twenty hand-built rows, rank.rank_rows's classifier-only AUC beside the blended-order AUCsacred/ — a real Sacred FileStorageObserver directory, four arms rankedtensorflow/ — a real Keras/CSVLogger run, four learning-rate arms rankedwandb/ — a real offline W&B run directory, four arms rankedworkspace/ — the ledger and claim checker, three claims wrong on purposeA model server at LLM_BASE_URL: every path above needs no model; this
one does, to score prompts against a running LLM.
prompt-evals/ — the tagging prompt's dev score and the transfer gateSee examples/README.md for what each demonstrates, and demos/ for six
scripts that record these surfaces on video. The most thorough is flows/:
uv run --group examples python examples/flows/run_all.py --offline
examples/flows/README.md explains each flow;
examples/flows/RESULTS.md records what the live run measured.
uv run --group docs mkdocs serve runs a browsable site over everything
below. The guides, one per question:
Plus docs/concepts.md for first-ten-minutes vocabulary, the
CLI reference (docs/reference/cli.md) and API reference under docs/, design
records under docs/superpowers/specs/, measurement lessons
(docs/measurement-lessons.md), CONTRIBUTING.md for the
gates and conventions, and CHANGELOG.md for what's landed.
MIT — see LICENSE.