bama
BAMA: 모든 Mac 앱을 만들 수 있습니다
Fable 스타일 에이전트 행동을 활성화하는 Claude 스킬로, 명시적 다단계 계획·하위 에이전트 위임·자체 검증을 지원합니다
A Claude skill that activates Fable-style agentic behavior: explicit multi-stage planning, sub-agent delegation, and self-verification.
스킬Python · ShellGitHub @mrtooher직접 설치운영자 미확인
써 보셨어요? 한 번만 눌러 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없어요.
개인 계정의 공개 저장소 소유자는 GitHub로 로그인해 운영자를 확인하고 소개를 직접 관리할 수 있습니다. 관리자 승인은 필요하지 않습니다.
로그인한 뒤 확인 파일을 만들어 이 저장소의 기본 브랜치에 30분 안에 커밋해 주세요. 다른 브랜치나 포크의 파일은 인정하지 않습니다. 파일을 올린 뒤 아래에서 확인하면 관리자 승인 없이 관리할 수 있습니다. 자격을 유지하려면 파일을 남겨 두세요.
로그인이 필요하면 로그인 화면으로 이동합니다. 로그인 후 이곳으로 돌아와 원하는 확인 버튼을 다시 눌러 주세요.
설치형 프로젝트는 배포 도메인 없이도 확인할 수 있습니다. 개인 저장소는 GitHub 로그인으로, 조직 저장소는 위의 저장소 확인 파일로 직접 확인해 주세요.
메이커가 쓴 소개는 위의 한 줄이 전부입니다. 더 자세한 내용은 저장소 README에서 읽을 수 있습니다. 저장소 README ↗
README 전체를 불러오는 중입니다.
README 전문 보기 ↗Current: v6.1 (2026-10-24) — adds an error-first judgment check and a dissent check to step 3 for prose with no answer key (see
bench/judgment/). Live skills:fable-mode(rootSKILL.md),fable-opus,fable-sonnet,double-check,execution-guardrails. Ladder: Haiku → Sonnet → Opus → the user.fable-fable,fable-haikuand the v3agents/routing are retired — see SUPERSEDED.md. Sections below that describe them are kept as history.
Execution discipline for Claude on large tasks: a written stage map, delegation to named agents where the runtime allows, a verification check at every stage that can actually fail, a skeptical self-review, and a mandatory cold double-check before anything is delivered.
It is a checklist, not a capability transplant. Benchmarked three times so the README can say what it does and does not do (see Evidence).
Haiku → Sonnet → Opus → Fable 5.1 → the user
One skill per rung, same core loop, tuned to that tier's known failure mode:
| Skill | Model | Use it when | Known gap it guards |
|---|---|---|---|
fable-mode | whatever is running | default; adapts intensity to the model | — |
fable-fable | Claude Fable 5.1 | the deliverable needs an audit trail (worklog, reproducible checks, flagged judgment calls) or spans sessions | none measured — a provenance runner, not an accuracy runner |
fable-opus | Claude Opus | peak synthesis short of Fable; orchestrates Sonnet/Haiku workers | trusts its own introspection; scope growth |
fable-sonnet | Claude Sonnet | balanced default for thorough work | skips the failable check, substitutes "looks right" |
fable-haiku | Claude Haiku | bulk, cheap, parallel mechanical work | skips verification under time pressure |
Two always-on companions:
execution-guardrails — verify-before-flag, warning batching, word-boundary
find-and-replace. Every model, every task, whether or not the loop runs.double-check — the delivery gate. A panel of fresh checker agents (Haiku for
mechanical checks, Sonnet for requirements, Opus to adjudicate) attacks the
finished artifact. Every fable runner calls it before handing anything over.Field feedback on v2 (r/claudeskills): telling a model in prose to spawn a worker
almost always runs the task inline. So v3 moves the discipline into real agent
definitions under agents/:
fable-orchestrator — no Write/Edit tool. It cannot produce artifacts; every
one must come from a named worker. Opus by default; fable-fable runs the same
definition with model: "fable" (per-invocation override, documented for Claude
Code and confirmed in Cowork).fable-worker-sonnet / fable-worker-haiku — one bounded assignment, exact output
path, named pass condition, evidence in the report.fable-verifier — read-only; gets the spec and the artifact, never the producer's
reasoning.The skills shrink to routers. Full history in V3-CHANGES.md.
Three benchmark rounds, deterministic graders, tasks built with unstated traps
(duplicate rows, grep-invisible getattr("calc" + "_total"), errata chains superseded
by meeting notes, a real federal data file to fetch or fabricate).
| Tier | Effect of the skill | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | 0 delta — 100/100 in all 16 paired runs (n=2/cell, 4 tasks incl. open-ended real-data fetch); ~1.1× tokens, ~2× wall | BENCHMARK-2026-09-02.md |
| Opus / Sonnet | 0 delta on closed graded tasks; real on open-ended research — Opus+skill fetched and parsed the NIAAA state dataset, Opus baseline shipped synthetic trend lines | July 2026 rounds |
| Haiku | real but noisy: +25 / −17 across rounds; raises the floor on mechanical diligence, cannot supply synthesis | July 2026 rounds |
| v6.1 judgment check (checker only) | Sonnet checkers: tie, 24/24 both arms. Haiku checkers on subtler errors: 30/30 vs 28/30 — both misses a strawman "case against". Small sample. | bench/judgment/ |
Read: the loop's value inverts with model strength. On Fable 5.1 it buys provenance.
On Opus it buys real sources over plausible ones. On Haiku it buys verification the
model would otherwise skip — sometimes. The harness is in bench/; rerun it.
Claude Code (user scope — skills to ~/.claude/skills/):
git clone https://github.com/mrtooher/fable-mode.git && cd fable-mode && ./install.sh
Cowork / claude.ai: Settings → Capabilities → Skills → add each <name>/SKILL.md
(root SKILL.md is fable-mode). The agents are not loadable there; the skills detect
that and fall back to inline mode, saying so.
Do not install anything from
agents/as a skill. Those files are agent definitions: second-person system prompts whose frontmatter carriestools:andmodel:. Loaded as a skill they land in the main thread and assert things about it that are false there —fable-orchestratorin particular tells its reader it has no Write tool and must delegate to worker agents that do not exist on a skill-only surface. The result is a stall, or an inline run narrating a delegation that never happened — the exact failure v3 exists to prevent. Agents go inagents/, skills go in skills.
Folder name must equal the name: field in each SKILL.md or the skill will not trigger.
SKILL.md fable-mode (default, adaptive)
fable-fable/SKILL.md Fable 5.1 runner
fable-opus/SKILL.md Opus runner (orchestrator route)
fable-sonnet/SKILL.md Sonnet runner
fable-haiku/SKILL.md Haiku runner
execution-guardrails/ always-on rules
double-check/ delivery gate
agents/ orchestrator, sonnet worker, haiku worker, verifier
bench/ fixtures generator, graders, prompts, results.json
BENCHMARK-2026-09-02.md Fable 5.1 results
EXAMPLE.md worked before/after: the failable check catching a bug
V3-CHANGES.md why delegation became structural
install.sh Claude Code installer
One obvious approach that fits in a single pass → do it directly. Staging a trivial task buries the answer under ceremony. The loop earns its cost only when a one-shot attempt would plausibly miss something — or when you need to show your work.