Open Net Worth
Open Net Worth는 직접 운영하는 오픈소스 개인 AI 자산 비서로, 전체 재무를 하나의 원장에 기록하고 사용자가 제어하는 AI가 관리
아직 감지된 업데이트가 없습니다. GitHub 릴리스가 나오면 여기에 보입니다.
The open core of Pasiv — the code that touches money: fee engine, coin/pool specs, payout validators, and the pasivd headless daemon. GPL-3.0-only.
README 전체를 불러오는 중입니다.
README 전문 보기 ↗The open core of Pasiv — the code that touches money. GPL-3.0-only.
Pasiv is a one-button, non-custodial desktop miner. Its category is full of software that deserves suspicion, so the parts of Pasiv a user has to trust with their earnings are open source in this repository — readable, buildable, and pinned by tests:
| What | Where | Why it's here |
|---|---|---|
| The 4% fee engine | crates/pasiv-core/src/fee.rs | The compile-time fee address (the BTC treasury), the structural time-slice schedules (20 s in 500 s for a live-switching miner, 10 min in 4 h 10 min for one that must restart — exactly 4% either way, on every coin, only in the Mining state), and the append-only ledger every slice is written to |
| The payout route | crates/pasiv-core/src/unmineable.rs | Pasiv's one route (the default from 0.5.0, the only one from 0.7.0): the unMineable login (USDT:<your address>.<worker>#<referral>, BTC:…, or natively PRL:… / XMR:… per lane), the address rules (checksums verified where the chain has one), and the pool hosts — the pool pays your address; Pasiv never holds funds |
| The coin roster | crates/pasiv-core/src/coins.rs | Every coin Pasiv mines, the unMineable algorithm (and so the pool) it is mined under, and its native payout-address rule (Ravencoin and Ergo retired with Pasiv 0.6.11 on 2026-10-23; Zephyr, Salvium and Verus with 0.7.0, on the 1 November 2026 date, together with the legacy direct route) |
| Payout validators | crates/pasiv-core/src/address.rs | The paste-time rules for every payout address — USDT on BSC/TRON, and every coin's own |
| The mining state machine | crates/pasiv-core/src/state.rs | Drives both the UI and the fee counter — "never charge a paused user" is structural, not promised |
| Earnings-estimate math | crates/pasiv-core/src/profit.rs | Prices a coin on the user's take-home (net of the fee), never on gross |
| The $/day formula | crates/pasiv-core/src/earnings.rs | One function, every surface — desktop, daemon, phone totals |
pasivd, the headless daemon | pasivd/ | A complete, runnable end-to-end money path: fetches and SHA-256-verifies the official XMRig, mines Monero on the CPU on unMineable paid to your address — in USDT or BTC when your account has one, otherwise natively in XMR — takes the same 4% slice to the same treasury as the desktop, writes the same ledger, and stops mining rather than ever stick on the fee address |
The binding product commitments — including the never-list — are in
docs/FEES.md.
Pasiv is an open-core project, and says so plainly. The desktop GUI application, the iOS/Android companion apps, the Pasiv Cloud backend, the website, and the release/signing infrastructure are proprietary — they are the product that funds the work. What's open is everything a user must trust: where hashes go, what the fee is, how it's charged, and how it's recorded.
cd pasivd && cargo build --release. It runs
against the same cloud and pool the shipped binary does — and the API
endpoint is overridable by environment (PASIVD_API_URL,
PASIVD_ANON_KEY), so nothing forces a fork through Pasiv's backend.fee.rs (the BTC treasury), and your
local fee-ledger.jsonl uses the format in the same file.cargo test --workspace. The slice schedule, the 4%
ratio, the ledger format, the address rules, and the ranking math are all
pinned.The proprietary apps consume this crate as a pinned git dependency, so the
open constants and the shipped behaviour cannot drift silently: changing the
fee addresses or the slice schedules requires a commit here and a new signed
release there, each leaving a public diff. pasivd binaries attached to
Pasiv releases are
built from this source.
Why not on crates.io? Deliberate, two reasons. The Verus engine depends on
the vendored verushash-rs (its C++ is patched for arm64/clang), and a path
dependency cannot be published — we would have to publish a renamed fork of a
third-party crate, which helps nobody. More importantly, the git-rev pin is
the transparency mechanism: the apps name the exact commit they build against,
and bumping it leaves a visible diff on both sides. A crates.io version would
add a resolution layer without adding any verifiability. Revisit if the
verushash patches are ever upstreamed.