Sno Station
Sno Station은 AI 에이전트를 하나의 팀으로 묶는 오픈소스 워크스테이션으로, 로컬 머신에서 에이전트 협업을 가능하게 함
Claude Code 모드: 차이와 함께 인간이 검토해야 할 변경사항(비즈니스 로직·아키텍처·데이터·시크릿·제3자)만 표시, 나머지는 PR
Claude Code mod: a review pane that shows, with their diff, only the changes that need a human (business logic, architecture, data, secrets, third parties). The rest goes to the PR.
플러그인GitHub @pedrovelasquez9직접 설치운영자 미확인
써 보셨어요? 한 번만 눌러 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없어요.
저장소 정보는 아직 수집하지 않았습니다.
아직 감지된 업데이트가 없습니다. GitHub 릴리스가 나오면 여기에 보입니다.
메이커가 쓴 소개는 위의 한 줄이 전부입니다. 더 자세한 내용은 저장소 README에서 읽을 수 있습니다. 저장소 README ↗
README 전체를 불러오는 중입니다.
README 전문 보기 ↗English · Español
Claude Code mod and OpenCode plugin · v0.12.1. A review pane for the human in the loop. After the agent builds a feature, review-radar reads your branch diff and shows, with the diff lines and their files, only the changes a person must confirm: business logic, architecture, data and migrations, secrets, third-party services, security, infra, anything that looks like a mistake, and changes nobody asked for. Everything else is listed as "review in the PR". In OpenCode the same review lives in the sidebar and a dialog.
See what changed in each version in the changelog.
The goal: confirm or request changes on what matters without opening files one by one, and leave the routine for the pull request.
origin/HEAD, else origin/main, origin/master, main, master). Committed, uncommitted and untracked files are included.file:line, one sentence on what to check, and the diff hunk that holds it (a window around the line for long hunks).file:line, the problem it causes, the code under review as a diff, and the instruction to correct it (or revert it if it should not be there) and leave the rest as it is. Add anything of your own and send it: the session fixes it with no more context needed.| Category | What it covers |
|---|---|
business-logic | Rules, calculations, pricing, state transitions, domain validation, anything that changes behaviour for users or money |
architecture | New modules or layers, changed data flow, moved responsibilities, public API and contract changes |
data | Schema and migration changes, backfills, destructive operations, persistence and serialization formats |
secrets | Credentials, keys, tokens, config holding them, anything that could leak them |
third-party | New or changed calls to external services, SDKs, webhooks, new hosts, new dependencies |
security | Authentication and authorization, trust boundaries, crypto, CORS, injection surfaces |
infra | Deploy, CI, containers, runtime config, production feature flags |
suspicious | Likely mistakes in any file: values inconsistent with their neighbours or other files, copy-paste leftovers, removed things still referenced, flipped conditions |
unrequested | Changes Claude made in this session that none of your prompts asked for: an unrelated file touched, behaviour changed beyond the task, a new dependency, a refactor nobody requested. The finding says which request it goes beyond |
AI assistants sometimes do more than asked: a version bump a project rule asked for, a "while I was here" refactor, a dependency added on the way. review-radar compares what you asked for in the session with what Claude actually edited:
여기까지가 README 앞부분입니다. 나머지는 원문에서 읽을 수 있습니다. README 전문 보기 ↗