neuron-explorer
Steering-first neuron explorer for Qwen3.5-4B: push every MLP neuron, keep every rollout, browse the results
翻译准备中
不仅仅审查代理的代码;要让它经受考验。
AI 翻译
Don't just review the agent's code; put it through the gauntlet.
开发工具TypeScript · GoGitHub @Codagent-AI自行安装运营者未确认
试用过了吗? 点一下就好,无需登录。
正在加载完整 README。 以下为已保存的摘录。
Agent Validator is a configurable feedback runner for AI-assisted development workflows. It runs the checks and AI reviews that apply to the files that changed, records structured runtime state, and supports agent skills that can fix and rerun failures until validation passes.
Use it when you want an agent to work inside an external validation loop: build, lint, test, review, fix, rerun.
• Node.js 18 or newer
• Git
• Optional review CLIs: Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or OpenCode查看完整 README ↗Agent Validator is a configurable feedback runner for AI-assisted development workflows. It runs the checks and AI reviews that apply to the files that changed, records structured runtime state, and supports agent skills that can fix and rerun failures until validation passes.
Use it when you want an agent to work inside an external validation loop: build, lint, test, review, fix, rerun.
Requirements:
Install and initialize:
npm install -g agent-validator
agent-validate init
agent-validator is also installed as an alias, but the CLI help and generated docs use agent-validate.
After init, run /validator-setup from your coding agent to discover project tooling and write the first checks into .validator/config.yml.
task-compliance, activated with --enable-review.cli:
default_preference:
- claude
adapters:
claude:
allow_tool_use: false
thinking_budget: low
model: claude-sonnet-5-5
entry_points:
- path: "."
exclude:
- validator_logs
- .validator
checks:
- test:
command: npm test
- lint:
command: npm run lint
reviews:
- all-reviewers:
builtin: all-reviewers
This uses the preferred reviewer from the latest review evals. Measured on the all-reviewers eval fixture (56 seeded issues):
| Option | Adapter | Model | thinking_budget | Recall | Precision | Cost / review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred | claude | claude-sonnet-5-5 | low | 0.82 | 0.93 | ~$0.24 |
| Codex | codex | gpt-6-sol | medium | 0.70 | 0.74 | ~$0.15 |
See Recommended Reviewer Configurations for details. The 2026-10-15 end-to-end eval explains why the cheaper Haiku 5.5 is not recommended: its extra false positives cost more in fixing time and broken code than it saves on review.
Inline checks and reviews are defined inside entry_points. File-based gates are also supported under .validator/checks/ and .validator/reviews/.