Fire your SEO·GEO agency 🔥 A Claude Code skill that audits and optimizes SEO·AEO·GEO·LLMO·NEO(Naver) by itself — 월 50~350만 원짜리 'AI 검색 최적화' 대행, AI 에이전트가 대체합니다
翻译准备中
技能GitHub @leopard627自行安装运营者未确认
试用过了吗? 点一下就好,无需登录。
尚未收集仓库信息。
尚未检测到更新。GitHub 发布版本后会显示在这里。
制作者的介绍仅有上面的一句话。 更多详情请阅读仓库 README。 仓库 README ↗
正在加载完整 README。
查看完整 README ↗한국어 · English
Paying $400–$2,500/month for an SEO or "AI visibility" agency? Fire them. Your AI agent can do the work.
A wave of services now charges monthly retainers for "AI-era search optimization", "guaranteed ChatGPT citations", and "LLM visibility". Most of what they actually do is public standards and repeatable checklists. When a human does it, it's a retainer. When your agent does it, it's a skill.
This repository is a Claude Code skill. Install it and your agent audits your site, fixes what's broken, and measures the results.
This is not theory. The same playbook, applied to Chickenstock — a solo-built Korean stock research service:
The journey is documented publicly on Threads @kindainvestor.
"Search optimization" means different things to different engines. This skill treats them as five distinct lanes:
| Lane | Target | The question it answers |
|---|---|---|
| SEO | Google & Bing crawlers | Can crawlers read and index my content at all? |
| AEO (Answer Engine) | Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot | Does the AI answer box above the results cite me? |
| GEO (Generative Engine) | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude | When generative AI browses, am I the primary source? |
| LLMO (LLM Optimization) | The model's own knowledge | Does the model know my brand — and know it correctly? |
| NEO (Naver Engine) | Naver search & AI Briefing | Half of the Korean market — does Naver cite me? |
NEO is what makes this skill different. Global AEO guides ignore Naver entirely, but if you serve the Korean market, half your traffic lives there.
Plus a content engine. Most of a retainer pays for "N posts a month". This skill replaces that with a pipeline: a question backlog pulled from your own search data, a frontmatter content model that generates the JSON-LD, a publish gate every post must pass, and a refresh/merge policy so posts don't rot. Output is measured as "posts that get seen and cited", not "posts published".
As a plugin (recommended — one command, easy updates):
/plugin marketplace add leopard627/fire-your-seo-agency
/plugin install fire-your-seo-agency@fire-your-seo-agency
Or via git clone:
# As a project skill (this project only)
git clone https://github.com/leopard627/fire-your-seo-agency.git .claude/skills/fire-your-seo-agency
# Or as a personal skill (every project)
git clone https://github.com/leopard627/fire-your-seo-agency.git ~/.claude/skills/fire-your-seo-agency
For Codex, put it under .agents/skills (no need to commit a copy into your repo):
git clone https://github.com/leopard627/fire-your-seo-agency.git .agents/skills/fire-your-seo-agency # project
git clone https://github.com/leopard627/fire-your-seo-agency.git ~/.agents/skills/fire-your-seo-agency # personal
Then in Claude Code:
/fire-your-seo-agency audit my site
Your agent starts with a crawler-eye audit and returns a scorecard like this before touching anything:
| Lane | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| SEO | ⚠️ | Body is SSR'd, but 214 detail pages missing from sitemap |
| AEO | ❌ | No direct-answer first paragraphs; FAQ structured data: 0 |
| GEO | ❌ | No llms.txt; GPTBot/PerplexityBot policy undecided in robots.txt |
| LLMO | ⚠️ | Brand name spelled 3 different ways across surfaces |
| NEO | ❌ | Not registered in Naver Search Advisor |
…then proposes priorities, implements them, and schedules the re-measurement.
The whole philosophy fits in one line: AI doesn't cite good writing. AI cites accurate data. Become the primary source for a number, and the citations follow.
以上为 README 的开头部分。其余内容请阅读原文。 查看完整 README ↗