Codync
免费开源的 1:1 Grok Bot 与 Muse 替代方案。可在 iPhone、Mac 或 Linux 桌面上将 Claude 代码、Codex、Cursor 以及 40 多个编码代理作为持久机器人使用。支持群组聊天、线程、应用。
AI 翻译
个人 GitHub 账号下公开仓库的所有者可以登录并验证所有权,自行管理介绍,无需管理员批准。
登录并生成验证文件,在 30 分钟内将其提交到此仓库的默认分支。其他分支或分叉仓库中的文件无效。然后在下方检查文件,即可无需管理员批准直接管理项目。请保留文件以维持管理权限。
如需登录,将前往登录页面。登录后请回到此处,再次点击所选的验证按钮。
在项目文件夹中运行 /nomorevibe verify,即可验证所有权并自行管理介绍。
一分钟完成验证Deterministic, auto-graded environments for AI agents on Indian-reality tasks: UPI, GST, trip planning, forms, Hindi/Hinglish support. Rule-based grading, no LLM judge.
翻译准备中
取自仓库 README
正在加载完整 README。
查看完整 README ↗Deterministic, auto-graded environments for AI agents doing tasks set in India: planning a trip around rail quotas and waitlists, GST invoicing, filling forms, answering customers in Hindi and other Indian languages. By Navital Labs. Navital Gym is public and in active development: results are added as runs finish (see docs/RESULTS.md).
pip install navital-gym && navital-gym run --env trip --agent oracle (prints 1.00), then see the live leaderboard or docs/RESULTS.md.Read this first. Every environment uses a simplified, documented version of Indian practice and synthetic data. These are tests for AI agents, not statements about current law, railway, bank or tax rules. Not affiliated with or endorsed by NPCI, RBI, GSTN / CBIC, IRCTC / Indian Railways, any bank or any government body; names are used only to describe the workflow. Not financial or tax advice. Each env README states its own rules and an "as of" date.
| env | what the agent does | tasks |
|---|---|---|
trip | Indian trip planning under real constraints: trains with quotas / waitlists / classes, flights, road, hotels, seasons, permits | 55 (17 infeasible) |
gst | GST Desk: invoicing and return computations from documents under written, simplified rules | 50 |
form | Form Desk: filling and checking forms (KYC-style fields, addresses, numbers) | 50 |
support | Bhasha Support Desk: e-commerce returns, refunds and privacy requests in Hindi / Hinglish; Tamil, Bengali and Marathi as a labelled experimental split | 50 core + 26 experimental |
form_multidoc | Form Desk, multi-document: cross-checking identity documents and records (multi-document, PAN-name, record conflicts, OCR repair, batch) and reporting what disagrees | 40 |
upi | UPI Desk: payment attempts and disputes under written, simplified rules | 50 |
Every env README carries its simplified rules and the sources of any real-world figure.
Install from PyPI, or straight from GitHub, or from a clone (for development):
pip install navital-gym
pip install git+https://github.com/Navitallabs/navital-gym.git
pip install -e . # inside a clone
Then:
navital-gym list # envs, task counts, baselines
navital-gym run --env trip --agent oracle # a scripted reference agent: should print 1.00
navital-gym run --env trip --agent heuristic --k 3 --out runs/trip.json
python -m unittest discover -s tests # no dependencies needed
Run any model that speaks the OpenAI chat API with tool calling (Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, hosted): --agent "openai:qwen2.5:7b@http://localhost:11434/v1" (the key is read from the provider's environment variable, OPENAI_API_KEY for openai: specs including a custom @base_url, GROQ_API_KEY, GEMINI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY; never from the command line). Reports show pass@1, pass^k, per-rule failures, and separate tables per split (core / experimental) and kind (feasible / infeasible), so one mixed number is never the headline.
Python:
from navital_gym.envs.trip import load_env
env = load_env()
obs = env.reset("IN-TRIP-002") # prompt + tool specs; nothing hidden
out = env.world.call("search_trains", {"from_city": "Delhi", "to_city": "Agra", "date": "2026-12-05"})
| target | install | entry point |
|---|---|---|
| Inspect AI | pip install -e ".[inspect]" | inspect eval navital_gym/adapters/inspect_task.py@trip --model ... |
| verifiers (v1 API) | pip install -e ".[verifiers]" | navital_gym.adapters.verifiers_env:load_environment |
| OpenEnv | pip install -e ".[openenv]" | navital_gym.adapters.openenv_env:make_app (served over websocket) |
| Each adapter has an offline end-to-end test with a scripted model. They are written against young APIs (verifiers 0.4.0 v1, openenv-core 0.3.0) and have not been run in a container or a hosted space. |
Pass@1 on deterministic stratified samples or whole splits (k=1, one run per cell; n = tasks, so one task is 1/n of the cell: read small-n cells as indicative). 'easy' columns are the easy tier (designed so a 7B-30B model can sometimes solve them); the others are the standard tasks. Full tables with format failures, strict (no-repair) pass@1, partial credit, spend, dates and commits: docs/RESULTS.md. Every row was re-graded by the same grading code (scripts/regrade.py); check it with git rev-parse v1.1.0:navital_gym (see docs/RESULTS.md).
Small and mid-size models: pass@1 (the typical user's models)
| model | trip | form | form multi-document | gst | support | upi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-haiku-4-5 | 0.35 (n=55) | 0.94 (n=50) | 0.98 (n=40) | 0.84 (n=50) | 0.42 (n=76) | 0.52 (n=50) |
| gemini-3.1-flash-lite | - | - | - | - | - | 0.78 (n=50) |
| sarvam-105b | 0.29 (n=55) | 0.98 (n=50) | 1.00 (n=40) | 0.82 (n=50) | 0.54 (n=76) | 0.58 (n=50) |
Small and mid-size models: partial credit (mean fraction of scored rules passed; shows progress where pass@1 is near zero)
| model | trip | form | form multi-document | gst | support | upi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-haiku-4-5 | 0.66 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| gemini-3.1-flash-lite | - | - | - | - | - | 0.92 |
| sarvam-105b | 0.56 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.75 |
Larger models, for reference (what strong models reach)
| model | trip | form | form multi-document | gst | support | upi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| claude-opus-5-5 | 0.93 (n=55) | 1.00 (n=50) | 1.00 (n=40) | 1.00 (n=50) | 0.97 (n=76) | 1.00 (n=50) |
| claude-sonnet-5-5 | 0.84 (n=55) | 1.00 (n=50) | 1.00 (n=40) | 1.00 (n=50) | 0.91 (n=76) | 0.94 (n=50) |
Most of the models people will test are small or mid-size, so they come first. Many score low: that is the point of a hard benchmark, but a cell near zero says little, so read partial credit next to it. Samples are small and the small and mid-size models above are not the strongest agents available; these results show that the environments separate models, not a leaderboard. Task difficulty labels are designer intent, not calibrated.
docs/ENV_AUTHORING.md (a new env is mostly data plus rules on the shared core) and docs/CORE-API.md (the frozen core interfaces).
Code: Apache-2.0 (LICENSE, copyright Navital Labs, see NOTICE). Task data: CC BY 4.0 (LICENSE-DATA), covering navital_gym/envs/*/tasks*.jsonl and navital_gym/envs/*/FLAG_CHANGES.md. Cite with CITATION.cff.