尚未偵測到更新。GitHub 發布版本後會顯示在這裡。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證Interactive simulator visualizing Solana's MCP + FBO vs FCFS transaction scheduling. See why Multiple Concurrent Proposers == markets and FCFS == bread lines.
翻譯準備中
取自儲存庫 README
正在載入完整 README。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
BreadLinesMarkets is an interactive Solana market-structure lens for the FCFS versus MCP debate.
The app is built to make one idea obvious: queueing rules shape markets. Under spam, FCFS starts to look like a bread line. Under MCP, oracle updates land earlier, useful flow gets blocked less often, and market conditions stay more stable.
It started as a simulator, but it is evolving toward real Solana flow analysis: simulated txs, perp execution pain, and wallet transfer activity all framed through the same question: does this flow get breadlined, or does market structure clear it cleanly?檢視完整 README ↗BreadLinesMarkets is an interactive Solana market-structure lens for the FCFS versus MCP debate.
The app is built to make one idea obvious: queueing rules shape markets. Under spam, FCFS starts to look like a bread line. Under MCP, oracle updates land earlier, useful flow gets blocked less often, and market conditions stay more stable.
It started as a simulator, but it is evolving toward real Solana flow analysis: simulated txs, perp execution pain, and wallet transfer activity all framed through the same question: does this flow get breadlined, or does market structure clear it cleanly?
getTransfersByAddress.getTransfersByAddress, including parsed rows that can surface p-token batch transfer activity when returned by Helius.npm install
npm run dev