Synaplan
開源 AI 平台,供企業使用:自行託管的 AI 代理、符合 GDPR 的聊天機器人小工具、RAG 知識庫、WhatsApp 與 Outlook AI、MCP、多模型路由。Docker、Kubernetes 或託管於 Germ
AI 翻譯
尚未偵測到更新。GitHub 發布版本後會顯示在這裡。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證正在載入完整 README。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
A fleet operations companion for a rental lot — damage and hold tracking, vehicle movement,
washbay throughput, crew scheduling, and an AI assistant, built around one operator's actual day.檢視完整 README ↗A fleet operations companion for a rental lot — damage and hold tracking, vehicle movement, washbay throughput, crew scheduling, and an AI assistant, built around one operator's actual day.
Live: fleet-garage.vercel.app
What FG is, honestly. It began as a proof-of-concept aimed at company adoption; it isn't that any more. FG is a personal tool with a single operator — it models a multi-person operation (the whole crew's schedule, the fleet, the airport queue) but has exactly one user. Nothing depends on it: the manual clipboard-and-memory way still exists and still works. FG exists to remove ambiguity — to turn recall and guessing into knowing — not to replace a system of record. Read the capability list below as "wired and working," not as "in daily use by a team."
Fleet Garage has evolved far beyond a simple damage ledger. It now encompasses the entire lifecycle of a vehicle on the lot:
src/lib/barcode.ts — 12-digit Canadian fleet codes: 0 + 4-digit area + 7-digit unit), with manual entry as fallback.| Role | Core Function | Can Release / Repair |
|---|---|---|
| VSA / Lead VSA | Log movements, check in vehicles, flag damage | No |
| CSR / HIR | View inventory, log lost & found | No |
| Branch Manager | Full operational control, override settings | Yes |
| Operations Manager | Full operational control, override settings | Yes |
(Also defined: Driver, CSR, HIR, AGM, GM, City Manager.)
How roles are actually used. Only one account is active, and it is a VSA. The role map in
src/lib/navigation.ts therefore functions as a scope control rather than a permission one:
it keeps the operator out of modules built on data FG doesn't have (fleet balance, turnaround,
driver coverage — the HIR/counter side), which would otherwise render empty or misleading. Those
modules are wired and working; activating another account is all they need. The role checks are
not a security boundary — see the RLS note below.
VehicleHoldContext, WashbayContext, IssueContext, LostFoundContext, FleetBalanceContext) plus AuthContext, ProfilesContext, PreferencesContext, ScheduleContext, ActiveSessionsContext, PendingWritesContext, ScanRouterContext, EffieContextnpm install
npm run dev
Requires a .env file connected to your Supabase instance:
VITE_SUPABASE_URL=<your-supabase-project-url>
VITE_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY=<your-supabase-anon-key>
npm run build # tsc -b && vite build
npm run lint # eslint
vite-plugin-pwa with a Workbox service worker (registerType: 'prompt', so the app never silently swaps under you). Note the flip side: the service worker serves cached chunks after a deploy, so hard-refresh before verifying new behaviour or you'll debug a ghost.signInWithPassword. Sessions are JWT-based. The profiles table (migration 054) links auth UUIDs to employee ID, name, role, and branch.withSubmitLock(key, fn) inside the context write function, never a React submitting flag — a state flag flips on the next render, so two taps in the same frame both pass and mint two rows.Every table has Row Level Security enabled, and 52 of the 66 policies in
migrations/schema.sql are USING (true) — allow-all (counted 2026-10-10). Of the remaining
14, none are meaningful access control either: four scope profiles rows, two are inserts written
WITH CHECK (true) (allow-all by another spelling), and eight simply bind a policy to a storage
bucket. Combined with an anon key that ships in the client, RLS here provides no
protection against a determined reader or writer. It is deliberate: FG is a trusted-crew tool
with one user, and the allow-all posture exists to match Supabase's expected shape and silence
the rls_disabled_in_public advisory — not to secure data.
Real per-user security would be a different architecture and would contradict the design. Do not cite RLS here as an access control, and do not put anything in FG that would actually hurt if it leaked. (An earlier version of this README claimed these policies "actively secure" the core tables from unauthorized manipulation. That was false, and it was the most misleading sentence in the repo — corrected 2026-08-25.)
This is not a system of record and nothing operationally depends on it. New tables ship with a
numbered migrations/NNN_*.sql file, RLS enabled plus an allow-all policy, and regenerated types
and schema snapshot — three halves, all required. The real type gate is tsc -b
(npm run build); bare tsc --noEmit checks zero files here, because the root tsconfig is a
solution file.