AI Decision System
Replayable, offline-verifiable records for AI-assisted go/no-go decisions: experiment promotions, typed model answers and human-approved actions.
翻譯準備中
尚未偵測到更新。GitHub 發布版本後會顯示在這裡。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證Model Context Protocol server for European Court of Human Rights case law: paragraph-level search, verbatim quotes with § numbers, and the citation graph (HUDOC Researcher)
翻譯準備中
取自儲存庫 README
正在載入完整 README。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
Model Context Protocol server for European Court of Human Rights case law:
paragraph-level search over the ~20,000 judgments of
HUDOC Researcher, with each
paragraph's case name, application number, date and § number, plus the
citation graph between judgments.
It is a thin wrapper over the live HUDOC Researcher API: BM25F ranking, section
weighting and filters all stay in the API, so an assistant and the website
always return the same results. Every result is the verbatim text of the
judgment, so answers stay citable to the paragraph.檢視完整 README ↗目前無法載入完整 README。請透過原文連結閱讀。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
Model Context Protocol server for European Court of Human Rights case law:
paragraph-level search over the ~20,000 judgments of
HUDOC Researcher, with each
paragraph's case name, application number, date and § number, plus the
citation graph between judgments.
It is a thin wrapper over the live HUDOC Researcher API: BM25F ranking, section
weighting and filters all stay in the API, so an assistant and the website
always return the same results. Every result is the verbatim text of the
judgment, so answers stay citable to the paragraph.檢視完整 README ↗