Busabase
Busabase is an open-source (MIT) database and workspace for AI agents — data, docs, skills, and apps in one place. Run it locally, self-host it inside your network, or use Busabase Cloud, and turn age
翻譯準備中
Implements a parsimonious evolutionary model to analyze and predict gene-functional annotations in phylogenetic trees as described in Vega Yon et al. (2021) <doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007948>. Focusin
翻譯準備中
資料R · TeXGitHub @USCbiostats上線中營運者未確認
試用過了嗎? 點一下就好,不需要登入。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證Statistical inference of genetic functions in phylogenetic trees
翻譯準備中
正在載入完整 README。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
aphylo: Statistical Inference of Annotated Phylogenetic Trees
How to cite aphylo. If you use aphylo in published work, please cite it:
Vega Yon GG, Thomas DC, Morrison J, Mi H, Thomas PD, Marjoram P (2021). Bayesian parameter estimation for automatic annotation of gene functions using observational data and phylogenetic trees. PLOS Computational Biology 17(2): e1007948. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007948
Run citation("aphylo") in R for the BibTeX entry.檢視完整 README ↗[!NOTE] How to cite aphylo. If you use aphylo in published work, please cite it:
Vega Yon GG, Thomas DC, Morrison J, Mi H, Thomas PD, Marjoram P (2021). Bayesian parameter estimation for automatic annotation of gene functions using observational data and phylogenetic trees. PLOS Computational Biology 17(2): e1007948. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007948
Run
citation("aphylo")in R for the BibTeX entry.
The aphylo R package implements estimation and data imputation methods
for Functional Annotations in Phylogenetic Trees. The core function
consists of the log-likelihood computation of observing a given
phylogenetic tree with functional annotation on its leaves and the
probabilities associated to gain and loss of function, including
probabilities of experimental misclassification. The log-likelihood is
computed using peeling algorithms, which required developing and
implementing efficient algorithms for re-coding and preparing
phylogenetic tree data to be used with the package. Finally, aphylo
works smoothly with popular tools for analysis of phylogenetic data such
as ape R package, “Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution.”
The package is under MIT License and is developed by the Computing and Software Cores of the Biostatistics Division’s NIH Project Grant (P01) at the Department of Preventive Medicine at the University of Southern California.
citation(package="aphylo")
When using aphylo, please cite the following paper:
Vega Yon GG, Thomas DC, Morrison J, Mi H, Thomas PD, et al. (2021)
Bayesian parameter estimation for automatic annotation of gene
functions using observational data and phylogenetic trees. PLOS
Computational Biology 17(2): e1007948.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007948
And the actual R package:
Vega Yon G (????). _Statistical Inference of Annotated Phylogenetic
Trees_. R package version 0.3-5,
<https://github.com/USCBiostats/aphylo>.
To see these entries in BibTeX format, use 'print(<citation>,
bibtex=TRUE)', 'toBibtex(.)', or set
'options(citation.bibtex.max=999)'.
This package depends on another on-development R package, the
fmcmc. So first, you need to
install it:
devtools::install_github("USCbiostats/fmcmc")
Then you can install the aphylo package
devtools::install_github("USCbiostats/aphylo")
library(aphylo)
Loading required package: ape
# This datasets are included in the package
data("fakeexperiment")
data("faketree")
head(fakeexperiment)
LeafId f1 f2
[1,] 1 0 0
[2,] 2 0 1
[3,] 3 1 0
[4,] 4 1 1
head(faketree)
ParentId NodeId
[1,] 6 1
[2,] 6 2
[3,] 7 3
[4,] 7 4
[5,] 5 6
[6,] 5 7
O <- new_aphylo(
tip.annotation = fakeexperiment[,2:3],
tree = as.phylo(faketree)
)
O
Phylogenetic tree with 4 tips and 3 internal nodes.
Tip labels:
1, 2, 3, 4
Node labels:
5, 6, 7
Rooted; no branch length.
Tip (leafs) annotations:
f1 f2
1 0 0
2 0 1
3 1 0
4 1 1
Internal node annotations:
f1 f2
5 9 9
6 9 9
7 9 9
as.phylo(O)
Phylogenetic tree with 4 tips and 3 internal nodes.
Tip labels:
1, 2, 3, 4
Node labels:
5, 6, 7
Rooted; no branch length.
# We can visualize it
plot(O)
plot_logLik(O)
set.seed(198)
dat <- raphylo(
50,
P = 1,
psi = c(0.05, 0.05),
mu_d = c(0.8, 0.3),
mu_s = c(0.1, 0.1),
Pi = .4
)
dat
Phylogenetic tree with 50 tips and 49 internal nodes.
Tip labels:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...
Node labels:
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, ...
Rooted; no branch length.
Tip (leafs) annotations:
fun0000
1 1
2 0
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 0
...(44 obs. omitted)...
Internal node annotations:
fun0000
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 1
6 0
...(43 obs. omitted)...
# Parameters and data
psi <- c(0.020,0.010)
mu_d <- c(0.40,.10)
mu_s <- c(0.04,.01)
eta <- c(.7, .9)
pi_root <- .05
# Computing likelihood
str(LogLike(dat, psi = psi, mu_d = mu_d, mu_s = mu_s, eta = eta, Pi = pi_root))
List of 2
$ Pr:List of 1
..$ : num [1:99, 1:2] 0.018 0.686 0.686 0.018 0.686 0.686 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.686 ...
$ ll: num -40.4
# Using L-BFGS-B (MLE) to get an initial guess
ans0 <- aphylo_mle(dat ~ psi + mu_d + Pi + eta)
# MCMC method
ans2 <- aphylo_mcmc(
dat ~ mu_d + mu_s + Pi,
prior = bprior(c(9, 1, 1, 1, 5), c(1, 9, 9, 9, 5)),
control = list(nsteps=5e3, burnin=500, thin=10, nchains=2))
Warning: While using multiple chains, a single initial point has been passed
via `initial`: c(0.9, 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, 0.5). The values will be recycled.
Ideally you would want to start each chain from different locations.
Convergence has been reached with 5500 steps. Gelman-Rubin's R: 1.0097. (500 final count of samples).
ans2
ESTIMATION OF ANNOTATED PHYLOGENETIC TREE
Call: aphylo_mcmc(model = dat ~ mu_d + mu_s + Pi, priors = bprior(c(9,
1, 1, 1, 5), c(1, 9, 9, 9, 5)), control = list(nsteps = 5000,
burnin = 500, thin = 10, nchains = 2))
LogLik (unnormalized): -20.1333
Method used: mcmc (5500 steps)
# of Leafs: 50
# of Functions 1
# of Trees: 1
Estimate Std. Err.
mu_d0 0.9107 0.0797
mu_d1 0.1648 0.0800
mu_s0 0.1157 0.0735
mu_s1 0.1001 0.0442
Pi 0.5329 0.1450
plot(
ans2,
nsample = 200,
loo = TRUE,
ncores = 2L
)
# MCMC Diagnostics with coda
library(coda)
gelman.diag(ans2$hist)
Potential scale reduction factors:
Point est. Upper C.I.
mu_d0 1.01 1.05
mu_d1 1.00 1.00
mu_s0 1.00 1.02
mu_s1 1.01 1.02
Pi 1.00 1.00
Multivariate psrf
1.01
plot(ans2$hist)
pred <- prediction_score(ans2, loo = TRUE)
pred
Prediction score (H0: Observed = Random)
N obs. : 99
alpha(0, 1) : 0.26, 0.74
Observed : 0.71
Random : 0.62
P(<t) : 0.1121
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Values scaled to range between 0 and 1, 1 being best.
Significance levels: *** p < .01, ** p < .05, * p < .10
AUC 0.79.
MAE 0.29.
plot(pred)
During the development process, we decided to allow the user to choose what ‘tree-reader’ function he would use, particularly between using either the rncl R package or ape. For such, we created a short benchmark that compares both functions here.