Give your agent a wallet you control.
Let your agents pay online using one-time-use cards or with machine payment protocols. You approve every request.
I have been working on an AI-based expense tracker app which is now open source
FinanceScala · PythonGitHub @AlexITCOnlineOwner unconfirmed
Have you tried it? One tap is enough. No sign-in needed.
No updates detected yet. GitHub releases will appear here.
Owners of public repositories under a personal GitHub account can sign in to verify ownership and manage the introduction themselves. No administrator approval is needed.
Sign in, generate a verification file, and commit it to this repository’s default branch within 30 minutes. Files on other branches or forks do not count. Then check the file below to manage the project without administrator approval. Keep the file to retain your access.
If needed, you will go to sign-in. After signing in, return here and press your chosen verification button again.
Run /nomorevibe verify in your project folder to verify ownership and manage the introduction yourself.
Verify in one minuteAsk about other verification options
Self-hosted LLM-based personal expense-tracker; Built entirely with AI
Taken from the repository README
Loading the full README.
Read the full README ↗A self-hosted expense tracker that turns receipts and bank statements into a clean, reconciled ledger.
Snap a receipt or upload a PDF bank statement and the app extracts the transactions, classifies and matches them to your expenses, and verifies the numbers add up, the goal is to kee your ledger complete and trustworthy with little manual entry.
I want to understand my spending: where my money goes and where I could save. The app turns my receipts and bank statements into a ledger I can trust. One question I want it to answer: "I want to buy this, can I?"
It is also an experiment in building a real app with AI. I don't write the code. I direct the AI and review its output, and when it gets something wrong I fix the workflow rather than patch the code myself. Having the AI plan before it writes code is a big part of how this works. I want to see how far this goes while keeping the code decent, and that friction shows me where my AI workflows need work.
AI is used in two places: building the app, and features inside it such as receipt OCR and bank statement extraction, with more planned.
It is self-hosted, so my financial data stays on my own instance.
I build it in public on purpose. If the AI pushes bad code it is visible to anyone, and the risk of embarrassment keeps the bar higher.
Experimental, with frequent breaking changes. It is not optimized for performance. The goal is a decent, working app. No fixed end goal, though handling small company expenses later would be nice.
CHARGES/CREDITS columns, CR markers,
foreign-currency rows, multiple cardholders, and header/footer noise. Extracted rows link back to
your expenses so nothing is double-counted.AWS-backed features (Textract, Bedrock, Bedrock Data Automation, S3) default to mock mode, so the
app runs end-to-end locally with no cloud account; set them to real for production.
Requires JDK, sbt, Node, and PostgreSQL. See docs/guide/local-setup.md for the full setup, then:
sbt server/run # backend (http://localhost:9000)
sbt web/dev # frontend (http://localhost:8080)
Database schema is managed by Play Evolutions and applied on startup. API docs (Swagger UI) are served
at /api/docs/index.html.
sbt server/test # backend (needs Docker for a throwaway Postgres)
sbt web/test # frontend
Runs the whole app locally: Postgres, backend, and web with no extra setup:
docker compose up --build
Then open http://localhost:8080. The web dev server proxies /api/* to the backend
container, so the frontend reaches the backend with no reverse proxy. The first start is slow
(it links the Scala.js bundle and boots webpack); later starts are fast.
What comes up:
| Service | Port | What it runs |
|---|---|---|
postgres | — | Postgres 16 (schema applied automatically by Play Evolutions) |
backend | 9000 | Play backend in dev mode (sbt server/run) |
web | 8080 | Scala.js webpack dev server (sbt dev-web), proxies /api → backend |
Stop with Ctrl-C; docker compose down -v also removes the database volume.
Receipt OCR and bank-statement extraction use AWS. They default to mock (no AWS calls), so the
app runs fully without an AWS account. To enable the real services, copy .env.example to .env,
set the relevant *_MODE to real, and fill in credentials, docker-compose propagates these into
the backend container:
| Variable | Purpose |
|---|---|
TEXTRACT_MODE / BEDROCK_MODE / BDA_MODE | mock (default) or real per feature |
AWS_REGION, AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID, AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY | credentials for Textract + S3 |
AWS_S3_BUCKET | bucket for stored documents |
BEDROCK_REGION, BEDROCK_ACCESS_KEY_ID, BEDROCK_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY | statement extraction (Amazon Bedrock) |
BDA_PROFILE_ARN, BDA_STANDARD_PROJECT_ARN, BDA_BANK_STATEMENT_BLUEPRINT_ARN, BDA_OUTPUT_S3_URI | statement-extraction fallback (Bedrock Data Automation) |
JEV_MODE | mock (default, placeholder picks, no document classification) or real for bank-statement row category/merchant suggestions and the document classifier (JEV) |
JEV_API_KEY (optional JEV_BASE_URL, JEV_MODEL, JEV_MIN_CONFIDENCE) | JEV API credentials for the suggestions and the classifier; JEV_MIN_CONFIDENCE (default 0.85) is the lowest document-type confidence the classifier acts on |
Ansible playbooks under infra/ deploy to a managed server behind nginx. Admin API routes are intended
to sit behind the reverse proxy's HTTP basic auth — keep that in place.
Bootstrapped from the wiringbits Scala web-app template.
MIT — see LICENSE.