neuron-explorer
Steering-first neuron explorer for Qwen3.5-4B: push every MLP neuron, keep every rollout, browse the results
Evidence-grounded incident postmortem drafting for DevOps and SRE teams. Every claim cites real recorded evidence; unsupported claims are marked, never fabricated.
Developer toolsPython · TypeScriptGitHub @vishmatale-nanoneuronOnlineOwner unconfirmed
Have you tried it? One tap is enough. No sign-in needed.
No updates detected yet. GitHub releases will appear here.
Owners of public repositories under a personal GitHub account can sign in to verify ownership and manage the introduction themselves. No administrator approval is needed.
Sign in, generate a verification file, and commit it to this repository’s default branch within 30 minutes. Files on other branches or forks do not count. Then check the file below to manage the project without administrator approval. Keep the file to retain your access.
If needed, you will go to sign-in. After signing in, return here and press your chosen verification button again.
Run /nomorevibe verify in your project folder to verify ownership and manage the introduction yourself.
Verify in one minuteAsk about other verification options
Evidence-grounded incident postmortem drafting for DevOps and SRE teams -- every claim cites recorded evidence, unsupported claims are marked, never invented
Taken from the repository README
Loading the full README. The saved excerpt is shown below.
www.nanoneuron.ai — evidence-grounded incident postmortem drafting for DevOps and SRE teams, and freelance SRE/DevOps consultants.
Record what actually happened during an incident. Get an AI-drafted postmortem where every claim
points back to a real, recorded evidence entry — anything the evidence doesn't support is marked
unsupported, never invented.Read the full README ↗www.nanoneuron.ai — evidence-grounded incident postmortem drafting for DevOps and SRE teams, and freelance SRE/DevOps consultants.
Record what actually happened during an incident. Get an AI-drafted postmortem where every claim points back to a real, recorded evidence entry — anything the evidence doesn't support is marked unsupported, never invented.
The drafting model is given numbered evidence entries and told to cite the entry number behind
every claim. Independently of what the model says about its own citations, code re-verifies every
citation against the real evidence list before anything is stored. A claim with no valid citation
is replaced with a fixed "Not established by the recorded evidence." marker, or dropped. This
verification step can only remove or replace the model's text — it never adds anything.
Publishing always records a named human approver; the database itself refuses to mark a postmortem
published without one (a CHECK constraint, not just application logic).
See it applied to a real, public incident: what the tool drafted from GitHub's August 2026 outage — real, unedited output, not a cherry-picked demo. The mechanism itself: how postmortem drafting is grounded, mechanically.
Full detail: docs · llms.txt (short) · llms-full.txt (complete reference, checked against the running code)
This is a real, running product, not a demo or a starter kit — the source here is public for transparency into how the grounding mechanism actually works.
Published postmortems, when any exist, are public and citable: nanoneuron.ai/postmortems