dumbtv
dumbtv takes the ads, screen tracking and update nags out of your Fire TV over ADB. No root, none of your apps touched, every step can be undone. Free and open source.
A tool for verifying game-hopping proofs
Translation pending
SecurityPython · JavaScriptGitHub @ProofFrogOnlineOwner unconfirmed
Have you tried it? One tap is enough. No sign-in needed.
Owners of public repositories under a personal GitHub account can sign in to verify ownership and manage the introduction themselves. No administrator approval is needed.
Sign in, generate a verification file, and commit it to this repository’s default branch within 30 minutes. Files on other branches or forks do not count. Then check the file below to manage the project without administrator approval. Keep the file to retain your access.
If needed, you will go to sign-in. After signing in, return here and press your chosen verification button again.
Run /nomorevibe verify in your project folder to verify ownership and manage the introduction yourself.
Verify in one minuteAsk about other verification options
A tool for verifying transitions in cryptographic game-hopping proofs
Translation pending
Taken from the repository README
Loading the full README. The saved excerpt is shown below.
A tool for checking transitions in cryptographic game-hopping proofs.
ProofFrog checks the validity of game hops for cryptographic game-hopping proofs in the reduction-based security paradigm: it checks that the starting and ending games match the security definition, and that each adjacent pair of games is either interchangeable (by code equivalence) or justified by a stated assumption. Proofs are written in FrogLang, a small C/Java-style domain-specific language designed to look like a pen-and-paper proof.Read the full README ↗The full README is unavailable right now. Read it at the original link. The saved excerpt is shown below.
A tool for checking transitions in cryptographic game-hopping proofs.
ProofFrog checks the validity of game hops for cryptographic game-hopping proofs in the reduction-based security paradigm: it checks that the starting and ending games match the security definition, and that each adjacent pair of games is either interchangeable (by code equivalence) or justified by a stated assumption. Proofs are written in FrogLang, a small C/Java-style domain-specific language designed to look like a pen-and-paper proof.Read the full README ↗