Seen to Fail

A small web app that records whether your automated checks have ever been seen to catch the defect they exist for.

This repository's own record is published at seen-to-fail.async-digital.com.

Lint rules, pre-commit hooks, CI gates and review bots are easy to add and hard to trust. A check that has never reported anything looks the same whether it works and has had nothing to catch, or is broken and cannot catch anything. The only way to tell the two apart is to plant the defect on purpose, watch the check catch it, and write down what happened. Seen to Fail is that record.

Claude, an AI coding agent, wrote the code under the owner's direction. How it is built says what the owner decided and how the work was checked.

The sample workspace dates every run and observation from the day it is loaded, so pnpm db:seed gives the same five counts whenever it runs.

Using it on your own repository

This repository records its own checks. It is not a service you can point at your pipeline, and the code is not published as a package. There are three ways you might want to use it. Two work today and one does not.

Run canfail in your repository for the verdict alone. canfail does the replaying. It is a separate tool and needs nothing from this project, not even git. Write a canfail.json at your root in canfail's own format, naming each check's command and the breaks to plant, and run it:

pip install canfail
canfail canfail.json

canfail runs each check on a clean tree, applies each break, runs the check again, puts the file back and says whether the check caught the break. That tells you whether a check catches its defect today. It keeps no record, so it cannot tell you whether a check has ever caught one or when that proof goes stale. The rest of this repository adds that record. A replay, start to finish describes this repository's own declaration and the version it pins.

To run it in CI, use canfail-action. This repository published the action for that job and runs its own replay through it:

- uses: async-digital-ltd/canfail-action@5ffd94d2598c9f9ce91aecf1122b9296a38b56e7 # v1.0.0
  with:
    declaration: canfail.json # default
    skip: needsXcode # optional: drop checks this runner cannot run

The action installs canfail and the two packages its verdicts rest on, each by version and hash. It sets NO_COLOR and refuses a tree that is dirty before planting. It fails in three cases: a check that could not run, which it never reports as a verdict; a tree that does not come back; and a verdict that differs from the declaration. The declaration expects catches unless a break sets expectedVerdict. The verdicts go to the job summary and to a JSON report output. The action's README lists its inputs and what each way of failing means. Pin it by SHA, as above.

Copy this repository for the ledger and the weekly replay. The replay runs canfail over the checkout it runs in and reads dependsOn against that checkout's history. The published page links every commit into the repository it was built from. So the checks, the code they check and the ledger must all live in one repository, and a fork of this one records nothing about yours unless your code moves in with it. The copy brings the whole stack, so CI needs Node, pnpm and a PostgreSQL service. The layout under packages/ has to stay as it is, because the scripts find ledger/ from where they sit. Starting from a copy:

1. Replace the files in ledger/checks/ with one per check of yours, and empty ledger/runs/ and ledger/observations/, which hold this repository's own record. ledger/README.md gives the shape of each file.
2. Replace canfail.json with your declaration, and add checkId and dependsOn beside each check.
3. In .github/workflows/ci.yml, keep the steps that create the databases and that validate, build and check the ledger. Replace the other checks, which are this repository's own. Drop the ci-control/ branch trigger unless you will plant defects by hand that way. Delete the Pages upload step and the publish job unless the ledger should be public, and read What belongs on a public ledger before you decide.
4. Keep .github/workflows/replay.yml and .github/workflows/record-run.yml as they are. Neither names a check of this repository's. Keep .github/workflows/waiting-branches.yml too, and empty the list in .github/kept-off-main.json, whose one entry is a branch of this repository's and would fail the check as gone.
5. Rewrite or remove this README and docs/. packages/server/src/readme/ holds their counts to the tree, so pnpm test fails once your ledger differs. The published page also carries a "Made by" link to this project's studio, in packages/server/src/ledger/page.ts. The sample workspace that pnpm db:seed loads is invented data for the local app and never touches the ledger, so it can stay.

Recording another repository's checks from this one is not supported. Nothing here checks out a second repository. A run typed in by hand names no commit, so nothing stops it describing a check that lives elsewhere, and nothing ties it to that repository either. No ticket adds this. #180 is about each repository running a ledger of its own without copying this one, and is not built. #236 replays defects that must be committed to a branch of this repository, and reaches no other.

Run it locally

You need pnpm, PostgreSQL 16, and Node 24 or newer, the version .nvmrc names.

pnpm install
cp .env.example .env

.env holds DATABASE_URL and TEST_DATABASE_URL. The server reads both through one config module and stops, naming the variable, if either is missing. It also stops, naming both, if they name the same database, because the tests empty the test database between tests and pnpm db:test:reset drops it.

The database

Any PostgreSQL 16 reachable at those two URLs will do. Two routes follow. Pick one, because the two would compete for port 5432.

Homebrew, the route this project is developed on. pnpm db:up starts postgresql@16 as a service and creates the two databases named in .env if they do not exist yet. pnpm db:down stops it. A server started this way has no seen_to_fail role and no password, so the URLs in .env.example will not reach it. It does let in the user you are logged in as, and a URL with no user connects as that user, so take the user and password out of both URLs:

DATABASE_URL=postgresql://localhost:5432/seen_to_fail_dev
TEST_DATABASE_URL=postgresql://localhost:5432/seen_to_fail_test

Docker, provided but unproven. docker compose up -d starts the compose file's PostgreSQL 16 with both databases and the credentials .env.example already carries, which makes it the easier route on most machines. Nobody has run it here, because the development machine has no Docker installed. Treat it as unverified until someone reports otherwise.

Either way, apply the migrations:

pnpm db:migrate

Migrations are numbered plain SQL files in packages/server/migrations. The runner applies them in filename order and records each one in a schema_migrations table, so a second pnpm db:migrate applies nothing and says so. pnpm db:reset drops the development database, creates it again empty and reapplies every migration. It leaves the test database alone. pnpm db:test:reset does the same to the test database and nothing else. Run it when you edit a migration that is already applied, to get the edit into the database the tests use.

Read packages/server/migrations/README.md before writing a migration. It describes a trap this schema has fallen into twice. A check constraint passes on null, so it is vacuous for exactly the rows it exists to refuse. The same file says when to run pnpm db:test:reset.

pnpm db:seed

Loads the sample workspace of eight checks in the screenshot above, so you can see all five statuses working before any real record exists. Every check, run, observation and note in it is invented for this project and describes no real team's tooling. It empties the four tables before it inserts, so a second run replaces the workspace instead of failing. It only ever points at the development database.

The server

pnpm dev:server

Serves GraphiQL at http://127.0.0.1:4000/graphql, where you can read and run the schema and its queries. A liveness route at /health answers whenever the process is up. A readiness route at /ready answers only once the database does.

The client

pnpm dev:web

Serves the app at http://localhost:5173 and proxies /graphql to the server, so the server must be running too. pnpm build:web writes the production bundle to packages/web/dist.

The home page lists the checks under their status tiles, and a tile narrows the list to its status. The filter bar between them builds a filter one condition at a time. Each check has its own page, where you record an arming observation. You log runs through one form and add a check through another.

What belongs on a public ledger

A ledger maps where a project's checks have and have not been seen to work. For a check about quality, such as a type check, a lint or a build step, that map is harmless. For a check about security, such as a secret scanner, an access control test or a leak gate, a status of Unproven or Broken on a public page tells an attacker where to look. So a public ledger is for checks about quality, and a ledger of checks about security stays private.

A private repository does not make a private ledger. On the Free, Pro and Team plans a GitHub Pages site is public whatever the repository's visibility. Publishing one privately needs GitHub Enterprise Cloud (GitHub's documentation). If you copy this pattern for checks about security, run pnpm ledger:build and read dist/ledger where only the people who should see it can. Do not hand it to Pages.

This ledger is safe to publish because every check it declares is about quality. Every check in ledger/checks/ is named by hand on the list of checks safe to publish, in packages/server/src/ledger/publishable.ts, and the tests refuse a check that is not on it, whatever area it is filed under. Between them they catch a type error, a lint or formatting breach, a failing test, stale generated types, a workflow read differently from how it was written, a client that does not bundle or whose bundle grows past its baseline, a server that does not start, and a published record that is malformed or disagrees with what it was built from. None of them guards a secret, an access rule or a leak.

This project keeps no private ledger either. The repository has GitHub secret scanning and push protection switched on. Both are checks about security, so neither is on this ledger, and no record says whether either has been seen to catch anything. The page says so under its headline, so nobody reads its count as every check the project has (#240).

The breaks themselves are safe to publish. Every declared break in canfail.json is an edit to this project's own source, applied on a GitHub-hosted runner that is thrown away when the job ends. Declaring a new one takes a merge to main. Running one against this repository, by dispatching the replay workflow or pushing to a ci-control/ branch, takes write access to it.

More documentation

• How it works: the two logs behind each check, the five statuses and the order they are read in.
• Filters: the filter language, its link format, and how a filter reaches SQL.
• Stack: what the app is built with, and what the local server will and will not answer.
• The published ledger: how a run reaches the public record as a commit, and the route for recording one by hand.
• A replay, start to finish: the weekly job that plants each declared defect with canfail and records the verdicts.
• How much of this record is automatic: which checks a replay reaches, with the counts.
• What the build refuses to publish: the build's agreement checks, and where the page is served.
• Tests: the commands to check a change, the packages, and CI's steps.
• How it is built: who wrote the code, what was checked and what was not.
• What shipped, and where it could go: version 1, version 2, and what is still only a direction.

Licence

MIT, in LICENSE at the root of the repository.