AI Decision System
Replayable, offline-verifiable records for AI-assisted go/no-go decisions: experiment promotions, typed model answers and human-approved actions.
翻譯準備中
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證Tracks whether your automated checks have ever been seen to catch the defect they exist for.
翻譯準備中
取自儲存庫 README
正在載入完整 README。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
A small web app for tracking whether your automated checks have ever been seen
to catch the defect they exist for.
This repository's own record is published at
seen-to-fail.async-digital.com.
Lint rules, pre-commit hooks, CI gates and review bots are easy to add and hard
to trust. A check that has never reported anything looks the same whether it is
working and has had nothing to catch, or is broken and cannot catch anything.
The only way to tell the two apart is to plant the defect on purpose, watch the
check catch it, and write down what happened. Seen to Fail is that record.檢視完整 README ↗目前無法載入完整 README。請透過原文連結閱讀。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
A small web app for tracking whether your automated checks have ever been seen
to catch the defect they exist for.
This repository's own record is published at
seen-to-fail.async-digital.com.
Lint rules, pre-commit hooks, CI gates and review bots are easy to add and hard
to trust. A check that has never reported anything looks the same whether it is
working and has had nothing to catch, or is broken and cannot catch anything.
The only way to tell the two apart is to plant the defect on purpose, watch the
check catch it, and write down what happened. Seen to Fail is that record.檢視完整 README ↗