Synaplan
开源 AI 软件平台,面向企业:自托管 AI 代理,符合 GDPR 的聊天机器人小部件,RAG 知识库,WhatsApp 与 Outlook AI,MCP,多模型路由。支持 Docker、Kubernetes 或在 Germ 托管。
AI 翻译
尚未检测到更新。GitHub 发布版本后会显示在这里。
个人 GitHub 账号下公开仓库的所有者可以登录并验证所有权,自行管理介绍,无需管理员批准。
登录并生成验证文件,在 30 分钟内将其提交到此仓库的默认分支。其他分支或分叉仓库中的文件无效。然后在下方检查文件,即可无需管理员批准直接管理项目。请保留文件以维持管理权限。
如需登录,将前往登录页面。登录后请回到此处,再次点击所选的验证按钮。
在项目文件夹中运行 /nomorevibe verify,即可验证所有权并自行管理介绍。
一分钟完成验证AI governance obligations by jurisdiction, mapped to AI use cases and tiered by source (binding, expected, anticipated), as a web app, REST API and MCP server.
翻译准备中
取自仓库 README
正在加载完整 README。
查看完整 README ↗The Atlas sets out AI governance obligations by jurisdiction, maps them to standardised AI use cases (UC1 to UC10), and tags each by the tier of its source:
It is built for AI, technology and regulatory lawyers in external counsel firms. It serves the same records three ways: a web app, a REST API and an MCP server.
Records state what sources say and how they are classified. They are not legal advice and do not say what the law requires of any particular client; counsel decides what applies.
flowchart LR
R["Research and update agent"] -- "change proposals<br/>(governance interface 1.0)" --> F["Reasoning Fabric<br/>(closed)"]
V["Named reviewer<br/>(reasoning-fabric-app /admin/connector)"] -- "review decisions" --> F
F -- "snapshot: governed records<br/>+ provenance" --> A["Atlas<br/>web app, REST API, MCP"]
M["Triodian Metamodel<br/>(open schemas, policy)"] -.-> F
M -.-> A
vendor/triodian-metamodel (npm run sync-metamodel). Records are Obligations, External Organizations, Use Cases, Data Flows (monitored sources) and Triggers (instrument changes).policies/, and served in every snapshot and at /api/v1/policy). Nothing that sets a status, a date or a tier is published without a named approver. Every record carries a hash-chained provenance trail.data/research/ holds the research behind the seed.data/seed/build-seed.mjs turns it into connector proposals.data/snapshot/ holds what the Fabric returns. ai-obligations-atlas.json has the published records only. ai-obligations-atlas.preview.json adds records still waiting for review, marked pendingReview.npm ci
npm run dev # http://localhost:8787, published records only
ATLAS_PREVIEW=true npm run dev # include records waiting for review, with a preview banner
npm test # API, MCP, matter brief, language rules, provenance, keys, rate limits
npm run data:check # every snapshot record against its schema, language rules and hashes
Workers Builds deploys main. wrangler.jsonc serves public/ as static assets, and runs /api/*, /mcp and /healthz in src/handler.js. One Worker serves both domains:
| Domain | Shows |
|---|---|
obligations-atlas.triodian.com | Published records only. With the FABRIC_READ_TOKEN secret set, they are read live from the Reasoning Fabric (FABRIC_URL) and cached for ATLAS_CACHE_SECONDS. Without it, or if the Fabric cannot be reached, the bundled data/snapshot/ai-obligations-atlas.json is used |
obligations-atlas-test.triodian.com (ATLAS_PREVIEW_HOSTS) | The bundled preview snapshot, including records waiting for review, under a preview banner |
Attach both domains under Settings → Domains & Routes → Custom domain. Set the secrets under Settings → Variables and Secrets:
FABRIC_READ_TOKEN: the read-only obligations-atlas governance token;ATLAS_API_KEYS: optional, [{"firm":"…","keySha256":"…","perMinute":600}]./healthz reports which data a domain is serving (fabric, bundled or bundled-preview), and the last error reading from the Fabric, if any.
The reviewer approves in the review console, or locally with node scripts/connector.js review --reviewer "<name>" in reasoning_fabric. Then export a new snapshot:
# in reasoning_fabric
node scripts/connector.js snapshot ai-obligations-atlas ../obligations-atlas/data/snapshot/ai-obligations-atlas.json --url "$FABRIC" --token "$READ_TOKEN"
| Channel | Calls |
|---|---|
| Web app | Register (query by tier, jurisdiction, entity, use case), record pages with provenance, use cases, changes, matter brief, API and MCP page |
| REST API | /api/v1/obligations, /obligations/{id}, /instruments, /changes?since=, /provenance/{ref}, /use-cases, /jurisdictions, /organizations, /policy, /openapi.json |
MCP (Streamable HTTP at /mcp) | find_obligations, get_obligation, list_changes, explain_provenance |
Privacy.
schemas/matter-brief.schema.json. No client facts reach the server unless the lawyer chooses to share a brief's scope with Triodian (see below). The matter label is never sent.public/_headers sets a Content-Security-Policy, so the page runs only its own scripts and connects only to its own API. An analytics beacon injected by Cloudflare can't load. Turn off Web Analytics for the Atlas hostnames in Cloudflare as well.Firm registration and Bring in Triodian.
/firms/v1), and a named reviewer approves it in the review console (/admin/firms).FABRIC_READ_TOKEN, which needs the firms.submit scope. /healthz reports how many firm keys are loaded.Use cases and "any AI use". A record mapped to every standardised use case (UC1–UC10) applies to any AI use, such as board accountability or risk management, rather than to particular uses. When a lawyer filters by use case, records specific to it come first and records that apply to any AI use follow. They appear in a folded group in the register and a separate list in the brief. The API marks them appliesToAnyAIUse; includeAnyUse=false leaves them out.
Coverage. The Atlas covers Australia, Singapore and international standards. Asking the API or MCP server about another jurisdiction (EU, GB, NZ, US) returns a coverage note saying it isn't covered yet, so an empty result isn't read as "no obligations".
Language rules. Every API and MCP response is checked against the dataset's language rules before it leaves. A response that fails the check is withheld.
| App | What it is for |
|---|---|
| AI Obligations Atlas | The AI governance obligations that apply by jurisdiction and use case, tiered by source, with a matter brief for counsel |
| AI Board Direction | A board sets its direction on AI: where to use it, what to rule out, what comes back to the board |
| AI Risk Appetite | A regulated entity settles its appetite for AI risk, for the board to approve |
| AI Use Assessment | The AI in a regulated entity's supply chain, measured against that appetite |
| AI Confidentiality Exposure Assessment | Where confidential information in one transaction can reach an external AI model |
| Installer and suite test | Puts the apps a client needs into a Cloudflare account, and tests them together |
The engagement apps are separate, each with its own repo and database. Deployed together they share one sign-in and reach each other through Cloudflare service bindings.
Contributions are welcome: see CONTRIBUTING.md and the code of conduct. Report security problems privately, as SECURITY.md describes, not as issues.
Use it, review it, tell us you use it, or fund its upkeep: see SUPPORTING.md. Reviewers and organisations stay private unless they choose otherwise.
AI Obligations Atlas is open source under the Apache License, Version 2.0. Copyright 2026 Triodian Pty Ltd.
Third-party components bundled with it keep their own licences; see NOTICE.