Synaplan
開源 AI 平台,供企業使用:自行託管的 AI 代理、符合 GDPR 的聊天機器人小工具、RAG 知識庫、WhatsApp 與 Outlook AI、MCP、多模型路由。Docker、Kubernetes 或託管於 Germ
AI 翻譯
尚未偵測到更新。GitHub 發布版本後會顯示在這裡。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證AI governance obligations by jurisdiction, mapped to AI use cases and tiered by source (binding, expected, anticipated), as a web app, REST API and MCP server.
翻譯準備中
取自儲存庫 README
正在載入完整 README。
檢視完整 README ↗The Atlas sets out AI governance obligations by jurisdiction, maps them to standardised AI use cases (UC1 to UC10), and tags each by the tier of its source:
It is built for AI, technology and regulatory lawyers in external counsel firms. It serves the same records three ways: a web app, a REST API and an MCP server.
Records state what sources say and how they are classified. They are not legal advice and do not say what the law requires of any particular client; counsel decides what applies.
flowchart LR
R["Research and update agent"] -- "change proposals<br/>(governance interface 1.0)" --> F["Reasoning Fabric<br/>(closed)"]
V["Named reviewer<br/>(reasoning-fabric-app /admin/connector)"] -- "review decisions" --> F
F -- "snapshot: governed records<br/>+ provenance" --> A["Atlas<br/>web app, REST API, MCP"]
M["Triodian Metamodel<br/>(open schemas, policy)"] -.-> F
M -.-> A
vendor/triodian-metamodel (npm run sync-metamodel). Records are Obligations, External Organizations, Use Cases, Data Flows (monitored sources) and Triggers (instrument changes).policies/, and served in every snapshot and at /api/v1/policy). Nothing that sets a status, a date or a tier is published without a named approver. Every record carries a hash-chained provenance trail.data/research/ holds the research behind the seed.data/seed/build-seed.mjs turns it into connector proposals.data/snapshot/ holds what the Fabric returns. ai-obligations-atlas.json has the published records only. ai-obligations-atlas.preview.json adds records still waiting for review, marked pendingReview.npm ci
npm run dev # http://localhost:8787, published records only
ATLAS_PREVIEW=true npm run dev # include records waiting for review, with a preview banner
npm test # API, MCP, matter brief, language rules, provenance, keys, rate limits
npm run data:check # every snapshot record against its schema, language rules and hashes
Workers Builds deploys main. wrangler.jsonc serves public/ as static assets, and runs /api/*, /mcp and /healthz in src/handler.js. One Worker serves both domains:
| Domain | Shows |
|---|---|
obligations-atlas.triodian.com | Published records only. With the FABRIC_READ_TOKEN secret set, they are read live from the Reasoning Fabric (FABRIC_URL) and cached for ATLAS_CACHE_SECONDS. Without it, or if the Fabric cannot be reached, the bundled data/snapshot/ai-obligations-atlas.json is used |
obligations-atlas-test.triodian.com (ATLAS_PREVIEW_HOSTS) | The bundled preview snapshot, including records waiting for review, under a preview banner |
Attach both domains under Settings → Domains & Routes → Custom domain. Set the secrets under Settings → Variables and Secrets:
FABRIC_READ_TOKEN: the read-only obligations-atlas governance token;ATLAS_API_KEYS: optional, [{"firm":"…","keySha256":"…","perMinute":600}]./healthz reports which data a domain is serving (fabric, bundled or bundled-preview), and the last error reading from the Fabric, if any.
The reviewer approves in the review console, or locally with node scripts/connector.js review --reviewer "<name>" in reasoning_fabric. Then export a new snapshot:
# in reasoning_fabric
node scripts/connector.js snapshot ai-obligations-atlas ../obligations-atlas/data/snapshot/ai-obligations-atlas.json --url "$FABRIC" --token "$READ_TOKEN"
| Channel | Calls |
|---|---|
| Web app | Register (query by tier, jurisdiction, entity, use case), record pages with provenance, use cases, changes, matter brief, API and MCP page |
| REST API | /api/v1/obligations, /obligations/{id}, /instruments, /changes?since=, /provenance/{ref}, /use-cases, /jurisdictions, /organizations, /policy, /openapi.json |
MCP (Streamable HTTP at /mcp) | find_obligations, get_obligation, list_changes, explain_provenance |
Privacy.
schemas/matter-brief.schema.json. No client facts reach the server unless the lawyer chooses to share a brief's scope with Triodian (see below). The matter label is never sent.public/_headers sets a Content-Security-Policy, so the page runs only its own scripts and connects only to its own API. An analytics beacon injected by Cloudflare can't load. Turn off Web Analytics for the Atlas hostnames in Cloudflare as well.Firm registration and Bring in Triodian.
/firms/v1), and a named reviewer approves it in the review console (/admin/firms).FABRIC_READ_TOKEN, which needs the firms.submit scope. /healthz reports how many firm keys are loaded.Use cases and "any AI use". A record mapped to every standardised use case (UC1–UC10) applies to any AI use, such as board accountability or risk management, rather than to particular uses. When a lawyer filters by use case, records specific to it come first and records that apply to any AI use follow. They appear in a folded group in the register and a separate list in the brief. The API marks them appliesToAnyAIUse; includeAnyUse=false leaves them out.
Coverage. The Atlas covers Australia, Singapore and international standards. Asking the API or MCP server about another jurisdiction (EU, GB, NZ, US) returns a coverage note saying it isn't covered yet, so an empty result isn't read as "no obligations".
Language rules. Every API and MCP response is checked against the dataset's language rules before it leaves. A response that fails the check is withheld.
| App | What it is for |
|---|---|
| AI Obligations Atlas | The AI governance obligations that apply by jurisdiction and use case, tiered by source, with a matter brief for counsel |
| AI Board Direction | A board sets its direction on AI: where to use it, what to rule out, what comes back to the board |
| AI Risk Appetite | A regulated entity settles its appetite for AI risk, for the board to approve |
| AI Use Assessment | The AI in a regulated entity's supply chain, measured against that appetite |
| AI Confidentiality Exposure Assessment | Where confidential information in one transaction can reach an external AI model |
| Installer and suite test | Puts the apps a client needs into a Cloudflare account, and tests them together |
The engagement apps are separate, each with its own repo and database. Deployed together they share one sign-in and reach each other through Cloudflare service bindings.
Contributions are welcome: see CONTRIBUTING.md and the code of conduct. Report security problems privately, as SECURITY.md describes, not as issues.
Use it, review it, tell us you use it, or fund its upkeep: see SUPPORTING.md. Reviewers and organisations stay private unless they choose otherwise.
AI Obligations Atlas is open source under the Apache License, Version 2.0. Copyright 2026 Triodian Pty Ltd.
Third-party components bundled with it keep their own licences; see NOTICE.