Synaplan
开源 AI 软件平台,面向企业:自托管 AI 代理,符合 GDPR 的聊天机器人小部件,RAG 知识库,WhatsApp 与 Outlook AI,MCP,多模型路由。支持 Docker、Kubernetes 或在 Germ 托管。
AI 翻译
尚未检测到更新。GitHub 发布版本后会显示在这里。
个人 GitHub 账号下公开仓库的所有者可以登录并验证所有权,自行管理介绍,无需管理员批准。
登录并生成验证文件,在 30 分钟内将其提交到此仓库的默认分支。其他分支或分叉仓库中的文件无效。然后在下方检查文件,即可无需管理员批准直接管理项目。请保留文件以维持管理权限。
如需登录,将前往登录页面。登录后请回到此处,再次点击所选的验证按钮。
在项目文件夹中运行 /nomorevibe verify,即可验证所有权并自行管理介绍。
一分钟完成验证Open-source retros and estimation, with action items carried into the next retrospective.
翻译准备中
取自仓库 README
正在加载完整 README。
查看完整 README ↗Your team uses one tool for estimation and another for retros. Action items get written in a doc nobody opens again. And every sprint retrospective starts with a vague memory of what you all agreed to fix last time.
Ceremonies is a single, focused web app for the two ceremonies that matter most: estimation and retrospectives. It's opinionated about how those ceremonies should run - and it doesn't let you skip the uncomfortable parts.
No install. No signup for participants. Just go to ceremonies.dev.
Most ceremony tools are whiteboards dressed up in agile clothing. They give you sticky notes and call it a retro. They let you type numbers and call it estimation. They don't have opinions about how the ceremony should work - they just give you a canvas.
Ceremonies is different. It has opinions baked in.
In most tools, "anonymous" means your name isn't on the card. But everyone can see who's typing. Everyone can see the cursor moving. The social pressure is still there - you just can't see the names.
Ceremonies removes it entirely. No typing indicators. No avatars. No presence hints during the writing phase. You write what you actually think.
Every retro opens with Phase 0: a review of the action items from your last retro. Done or not done? No skipping it, no pretending it didn't happen.
Most teams forget 80% of what they commit to in retros. The Haunting is the fix. It's named that for a reason - the unfinished work comes back.
Standard Fibonacci goes 3 → 5. That gap is where most estimation arguments live - "is this a 3 or a 5?" teams go in circles. Ceremonies adds 4 to the deck. The 3-to-5 gap closes. Arguments shorten.
You can't jump from writing to voting. You can't skip grouping. The phases exist because the research on group dynamics shows they matter - writing before discussing prevents anchoring, voting before discussing prevents groupthink. The tool enforces the structure so the facilitator doesn't have to.
Participants join with a room code. That's it. No account, no email, no friction. Only facilitators need a login.
A clean, focused poker planning experience for your whole team.
A structured five-phase retrospective with permanent memory.
Those tools are general-purpose collaborative canvases. They're great for brainstorming, diagramming, and workshops. But they have no opinions about how a retro or estimation session should run. You're responsible for enforcing the phases, preventing anchoring, ensuring real anonymity, and remembering last sprint's action items.
Ceremonies is purpose-built. The phases are built in. The anonymity is structural, not cosmetic. The memory persists across sessions. You don't have to set it up or enforce it - it just works that way.
If your team runs ceremonies in Miro or FigJam, you're using the wrong tool for the job.
Ceremonies is MIT-licensed and designed to be self-hosted.
.env.example)npx wrangler login, then npx wrangler secret put INTERNAL_API_SECRET and npm run deploy:partyNEXT_PUBLIC_PARTYKIT_HOST to the Worker host (for example ceremonies-live.<subdomain>.workers.dev), and NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URL in wrangler.jsonc to your app URLgit clone https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/ceremonies.git
cd ceremonies
npm install
cp .env.example .env.local
# Fill in Clerk and Neon credentials
npm run db:push
npm run dev
Opens at http://localhost:3456. The PartyServer worker runs on :1999 in parallel.
Prerequisites: Node.js 20+, a Clerk account (free tier), a Neon database (free tier).
Docker support is planned for teams that need everything on their own infrastructure.
For contributors and the technically curious.
| Layer | Technology |
|---|---|
| Framework | Next.js 16 (App Router, Turbopack) |
| UI | shadcn/ui + Tailwind CSS v4 |
| Real-time | PartyServer on Cloudflare Durable Objects (WebSocket rooms) |
| Auth | Clerk (Google + GitHub SSO) |
| Database | Neon Postgres + Drizzle ORM |
| Deploy | Vercel + Cloudflare Workers |
Three Jira columns were added to the estimation_results schema in April. The migration was never pushed to production.
The deploy carrying the new schema went out on the 19th. Drizzle's select() enumerates every column it knows about, Postgres rejected the query with "column does not exist", and an outer try/catch in dashboard/page.tsx carrying the comment "DB might not be ready" swallowed it. Every signed-in user saw zero sessions for eleven days.
The reported symptom was "my history is gone". That points straight at data loss. Nothing was lost. Every row was intact the entire time and the dashboard could not read them. Trusting the symptom would have meant restoring backups over healthy data.
Two more bugs were sitting behind it. Some rows carried a literal placeholder string where a real identifier belonged, and one person had two teams because the same email registered against a test Clerk namespace and a live one, both pointing at the same database.
The pattern worth taking: a catch block with a reassuring comment is where bugs go to live. "DB might not be ready" was written for local startup and it silently absorbed a production schema mismatch for a week and a half.
This repo has a second instance of the same shape. retros.created_by was NOT NULL, retros started before Clerk finished loading had a null createdBy, and the save path was saveToDatabase().catch(err => console.error(...)). Fire and forget. The retros table was globally empty for three weeks with no user-visible signal. The fix that mattered was not the null check. It was broadcasting save_error back to connected clients so a failed write is visible to the person who caused it.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, code style, and PR guidelines.
If this saved you time, give it a star -- it helps others find it and keeps development going.
MIT. See LICENSE.