Synaplan
開源 AI 平台,供企業使用:自行託管的 AI 代理、符合 GDPR 的聊天機器人小工具、RAG 知識庫、WhatsApp 與 Outlook AI、MCP、多模型路由。Docker、Kubernetes 或託管於 Germ
AI 翻譯
尚未偵測到更新。GitHub 發布版本後會顯示在這裡。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
在專案資料夾中執行 /nomorevibe verify,即可驗證所有權並自行管理介紹。
一分鐘完成驗證Open-source retros and estimation, with action items carried into the next retrospective.
翻譯準備中
取自儲存庫 README
正在載入完整 README。
檢視完整 README ↗Your team uses one tool for estimation and another for retros. Action items get written in a doc nobody opens again. And every sprint retrospective starts with a vague memory of what you all agreed to fix last time.
Ceremonies is a single, focused web app for the two ceremonies that matter most: estimation and retrospectives. It's opinionated about how those ceremonies should run - and it doesn't let you skip the uncomfortable parts.
No install. No signup for participants. Just go to ceremonies.dev.
Most ceremony tools are whiteboards dressed up in agile clothing. They give you sticky notes and call it a retro. They let you type numbers and call it estimation. They don't have opinions about how the ceremony should work - they just give you a canvas.
Ceremonies is different. It has opinions baked in.
In most tools, "anonymous" means your name isn't on the card. But everyone can see who's typing. Everyone can see the cursor moving. The social pressure is still there - you just can't see the names.
Ceremonies removes it entirely. No typing indicators. No avatars. No presence hints during the writing phase. You write what you actually think.
Every retro opens with Phase 0: a review of the action items from your last retro. Done or not done? No skipping it, no pretending it didn't happen.
Most teams forget 80% of what they commit to in retros. The Haunting is the fix. It's named that for a reason - the unfinished work comes back.
Standard Fibonacci goes 3 → 5. That gap is where most estimation arguments live - "is this a 3 or a 5?" teams go in circles. Ceremonies adds 4 to the deck. The 3-to-5 gap closes. Arguments shorten.
You can't jump from writing to voting. You can't skip grouping. The phases exist because the research on group dynamics shows they matter - writing before discussing prevents anchoring, voting before discussing prevents groupthink. The tool enforces the structure so the facilitator doesn't have to.
Participants join with a room code. That's it. No account, no email, no friction. Only facilitators need a login.
A clean, focused poker planning experience for your whole team.
A structured five-phase retrospective with permanent memory.
Those tools are general-purpose collaborative canvases. They're great for brainstorming, diagramming, and workshops. But they have no opinions about how a retro or estimation session should run. You're responsible for enforcing the phases, preventing anchoring, ensuring real anonymity, and remembering last sprint's action items.
Ceremonies is purpose-built. The phases are built in. The anonymity is structural, not cosmetic. The memory persists across sessions. You don't have to set it up or enforce it - it just works that way.
If your team runs ceremonies in Miro or FigJam, you're using the wrong tool for the job.
Ceremonies is MIT-licensed and designed to be self-hosted.
.env.example)npx wrangler login, then npx wrangler secret put INTERNAL_API_SECRET and npm run deploy:partyNEXT_PUBLIC_PARTYKIT_HOST to the Worker host (for example ceremonies-live.<subdomain>.workers.dev), and NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URL in wrangler.jsonc to your app URLgit clone https://github.com/mshadmanrahman/ceremonies.git
cd ceremonies
npm install
cp .env.example .env.local
# Fill in Clerk and Neon credentials
npm run db:push
npm run dev
Opens at http://localhost:3456. The PartyServer worker runs on :1999 in parallel.
Prerequisites: Node.js 20+, a Clerk account (free tier), a Neon database (free tier).
Docker support is planned for teams that need everything on their own infrastructure.
For contributors and the technically curious.
| Layer | Technology |
|---|---|
| Framework | Next.js 16 (App Router, Turbopack) |
| UI | shadcn/ui + Tailwind CSS v4 |
| Real-time | PartyServer on Cloudflare Durable Objects (WebSocket rooms) |
| Auth | Clerk (Google + GitHub SSO) |
| Database | Neon Postgres + Drizzle ORM |
| Deploy | Vercel + Cloudflare Workers |
Three Jira columns were added to the estimation_results schema in April. The migration was never pushed to production.
The deploy carrying the new schema went out on the 19th. Drizzle's select() enumerates every column it knows about, Postgres rejected the query with "column does not exist", and an outer try/catch in dashboard/page.tsx carrying the comment "DB might not be ready" swallowed it. Every signed-in user saw zero sessions for eleven days.
The reported symptom was "my history is gone". That points straight at data loss. Nothing was lost. Every row was intact the entire time and the dashboard could not read them. Trusting the symptom would have meant restoring backups over healthy data.
Two more bugs were sitting behind it. Some rows carried a literal placeholder string where a real identifier belonged, and one person had two teams because the same email registered against a test Clerk namespace and a live one, both pointing at the same database.
The pattern worth taking: a catch block with a reassuring comment is where bugs go to live. "DB might not be ready" was written for local startup and it silently absorbed a production schema mismatch for a week and a half.
This repo has a second instance of the same shape. retros.created_by was NOT NULL, retros started before Clerk finished loading had a null createdBy, and the save path was saveToDatabase().catch(err => console.error(...)). Fire and forget. The retros table was globally empty for three weeks with no user-visible signal. The fix that mattered was not the null check. It was broadcasting save_error back to connected clients so a failed write is visible to the person who caused it.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for development setup, code style, and PR guidelines.
If this saved you time, give it a star -- it helps others find it and keeps development going.
MIT. See LICENSE.