dumbtv
dumbtv takes the ads, screen tracking and update nags out of your Fire TV over ADB. No root, none of your apps touched, every step can be undone. Free and open source.
翻译准备中
尚未检测到更新。GitHub 发布版本后会显示在这里。
个人 GitHub 账号下公开仓库的所有者可以登录并验证所有权,自行管理介绍,无需管理员批准。
登录并生成验证文件,在 30 分钟内将其提交到此仓库的默认分支。其他分支或分叉仓库中的文件无效。然后在下方检查文件,即可无需管理员批准直接管理项目。请保留文件以维持管理权限。
如需登录,将前往登录页面。登录后请回到此处,再次点击所选的验证按钮。
在项目文件夹中运行 /nomorevibe verify,即可验证所有权并自行管理介绍。
一分钟完成验证Tracking vulnerabilities contributed by AI-written code
翻译准备中
取自仓库 README
正在加载完整 README。
查看完整 README ↗A Georgia Tech SSLab catalog of public vulnerabilities whose root cause traces to AI-written code.
We start from disclosed GHSA and CVE advisories, not from a scan of every AI commit. A finding is published only when we can show three things on the same attack path: the AI-authored change, the vulnerable behavior, and the fix that closed it. Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, and similar tools all appear; the catalog is about the code they left behind, not a ranking of tools.
Browse the current catalog for cases and statistics. The catalog is a lower bound, not a census of every AI bug. Many AI-assisted changes never become a public advisory, and some that do leave a history we cannot recover.
What counts: AI introduced the flaw, exposed the vulnerable path, or left a security fix incomplete.
What does not: an AI marker, git blame, or model verdict on its own. We also do not claim that AI is riskier than human code. This dataset is not a rate comparison.
The longer writeup is on the site: How we verify.
A case looks wrong, or we missed one: open an issue or email [email protected].
MIT