aris-lite + aris + human feedback
翻譯準備中
外掛Python · BibTeX StyleGitHub @llv22自行安裝營運者未確認
試用過了嗎? 點一下就好,不需要登入。
尚未偵測到更新。GitHub 發布版本後會顯示在這裡。
個人 GitHub 帳號下公開儲存庫的擁有者可以登入並驗證所有權,自行管理介紹,無需管理員核准。
登入並產生驗證檔案,在 30 分鐘內將其提交至此儲存庫的預設分支。其他分支或分叉儲存庫中的檔案無效。然後在下方檢查檔案,即可無需管理員核准直接管理專案。請保留檔案以維持管理權限。
如需登入,將前往登入頁面。登入後請回到此處,再次點擊所選的驗證按鈕。
安裝型專案無需部署網域也可驗證。個人儲存庫可透過 GitHub 登入驗證,組織儲存庫可使用上方的儲存庫驗證檔案。
正在載入完整 README。 以下為已儲存的摘錄。
Let Claude Code do research while you sleep. Wake up to find your paper scored, weaknesses identified, experiments run, and narrative rewritten — autonomously. · Join Community
A Claude Code plugin for autonomous ML research workflows. Orchestrates cross-model collaboration — Claude Code drives the research while an external LLM (via Codex, through codex-bridge) acts as a critical reviewer. Also supports alternative model combinations (e.g., GLM + GPT, GLM + MiniMax) — no Claude API required.檢視完整 README ↗Let Claude Code do research while you sleep. Wake up to find your paper scored, weaknesses identified, experiments run, and narrative rewritten — autonomously.
A Claude Code plugin for autonomous ML research workflows. Orchestrates cross-model collaboration — Claude Code drives the research while an external LLM (via Codex, through codex-bridge) acts as a critical reviewer. Also supports alternative model combinations (e.g., GLM + GPT, GLM + MiniMax) — no Claude API required.
Why cross-model? A single model reviewing its own output creates blind spots. Two complementary models — Claude Code (Fable 5) for solid execution, GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh for rigorous critique — produce better outcomes than either alone. Going from 1 to 2 models is the biggest gain; adding more gives diminishing returns.
# 1. Clone and enter the project
git clone https://github.com/llv23/AutoResearchWithEyes.git
cd AutoResearchWithEyes
# 2. Set up Codex (cross-model reviewer) — any Codex >= 0.154
npm install -g @openai/codex
codex login
codex-bridge/bin/codex-bridge selftest # verifies reviewer calls + approval gate end to end
# 3. Launch Claude Code — skills and commands are auto-discovered
claude
# Run any workflow command:
> /autor.idea-discovery "your research direction" # Plain text → ./autor.idea_discovery/
> /autor.idea-discovery path/to/autor.idea_discovery/task_spec.md # Spec file → path/to/autor.idea_discovery/
> /autor.auto-review-loop # Review → fix → re-review overnight
> /autor.paper-writing "NARRATIVE_REPORT.md" # Narrative → polished PDF
> /autor.research-pipeline "your research direction" # Full end-to-end pipeline
Each command produces a self-contained output folder — the input spec, intermediate results, final reports, and live status tracking are all organized in one place:
path/to/
└── autor.idea_discovery/ # Self-contained output folder
├── task_spec.md # Copy of input (portability & reproducibility)
├── task_status.md # Live status, decisions, linked idea rankings
├── LITERATURE_SURVEY.md # Phase 1: landscape summary with paper table
├── IDEA_REPORT.md # Phase 5: ranked ideas + experiment plan
└── REVIEW_<topic>_<date>.md # Phase 4: external reviewer feedback
task_status.md is updated after each phase — it tracks pipeline progress, key decisions, and includes a ranked idea table where each idea links to its full description in IDEA_REPORT.md.
See click-through/case-0/ for a complete worked example.
All workflow commands follow the same self-contained output pattern: the output folder includes task_spec.md (input), task_status.md (live status with linked rankings), and all generated results — making it portable, shareable, and reproducible.
| Command | Input | Output Folder |
|---|---|---|
/autor.idea-discovery path/to/spec.md | spec.md | path/to/autor.idea_discovery/ |
/autor.idea-discovery "plain text" | (inline) | ./autor.idea_discovery/ |
/autor.idea-discovery spec.md — output: custom/ | spec.md | custom/ |
Override the output folder with
— output: path/to/output/appended to any command.
See Setup for full details.
/autor.idea-discovery, /autor.auto-review-loop, /autor.paper-writing, /autor.research-pipeline)research-reviewer (senior ML reviewer via codex-bridge) and paper-improver (2-round auto-improvement)CLAUDE.md, override per-invocation with inline argumentsTEMPLATE_DIR/VENUE/ → bundled → error with instructionsAutoResearchWithEyes/
├── CLAUDE.md # Centralized constants (single source of truth)
├── codex-bridge/ # Standalone reviewer-call component: Codex CLI adapter + approval gate
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── plugin.json # Plugin metadata (name, version, author)
├── skills/ # 10 atomic building blocks (auto-discovered)
│ ├── research-lit/ # Literature search (arXiv TeX, local PDFs, web)
│ ├── idea-creator/ # Brainstorm 8-12 ideas, rank by feasibility
│ ├── novelty-check/ # Verify novelty against recent literature
│ ├── run-experiment/ # Deploy to local/remote GPU
│ ├── monitor-experiment/ # Check progress, collect results
│ ├── analyze-results/ # Statistics, insights, comparison tables
│ ├── paper-plan/ # Claims-evidence matrix, section outline
│ ├── paper-figure/ # Publication-quality plots from data
│ ├── paper-write/ # Section-by-section LaTeX generation
│ └── paper-compile/ # Compile PDF, auto-fix errors, page check
├── commands/ # 4 workflow orchestrators (user-invoked)
│ ├── idea-discovery.md # research-lit → idea-creator → novelty-check → reviewer
│ ├── auto-review-loop.md # review → fix → re-review (×4 rounds max)
│ ├── paper-writing.md # plan → figures → write → compile → improver
│ └── research-pipeline.md # meta-pipeline: idea → implement → review
├── agents/ # 2 specialized personas
│ ├── research-reviewer.md # Senior ML reviewer via codex-bridge (GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh)
│ └── paper-improver.md # 2-round auto-improvement loop
└── templates/ # Venue-specific LaTeX style files
├── iclr2026/
├── neurips2026/
└── icml2026/
These commands compose skills + agents into a full research lifecycle. Use independently or chain together:
/autor.idea-discovery/autor.auto-review-loop/autor.paper-writing/autor.research-pipeline — from literature survey to submissionImportant: These tools accelerate research, but they don't replace your own critical thinking. Always review generated ideas with your domain expertise.
/research-lit → /idea-creator → /novelty-check → implement → /run-experiment → /autor.auto-review-loop → /paper-plan → /paper-figure → /paper-write → /paper-compile → submit
(survey) (brainstorm) (verify novel) (code) (deploy & run) (review & fix) (outline) (plots) (LaTeX+PDF) (compile) (done!)
├──── Command: /autor.idea-discovery ──────┤ ├── Command: /autor.auto-review-loop ─┤ ├────────── Command: /autor.paper-writing ───────────────────┤
/autor.idea-discovery)"What's the state of the art? Where are the gaps?"
Give a research direction (plain text or a path to a spec file) — the command handles the rest:
research-lit (arXiv TeX sources, local PDFs, web search)idea-creator (GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh)novelty-check + research-reviewer agent┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ /autor.idea-discovery │
│ │
│ research-lit idea-creator novelty-check │
│ (skill) (skill) (skill) │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Scan │───▶│ Generate │─────▶│ Check if │ │
│ │ arXiv + │ │ 8-12 │ │ idea is │ │
│ │ local + │ │ ideas │ │ novel │ │
│ │ web │ │ + rank │ │ │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │research- │ │
│ │reviewer │ │
│ │(agent) │ │
│ └──────────┘ │
│ │
│ Output: OUTPUT_DIR/ (self-contained) │
│ ├── task_spec.md (input copy) │
│ ├── task_status.md (live status + links) │
│ ├── LITERATURE_SURVEY.md (landscape) │
│ ├── IDEA_REPORT.md (ranked ideas) │
│ └── REVIEW_<topic>_<date>.md (reviewer feedback) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Components: research-lit skill + idea-creator skill + novelty-check skill + research-reviewer agent
/autor.auto-review-loop)"Review my paper, fix what's wrong, repeat until it's good."
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ /autor.auto-review-loop │
│ │
│ research-reviewer run-experiment │
│ (agent) (skill) │
│ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ External │──▶│ Implement│──▶│ Monitor │──▶ repeat │
│ │ LLM │ │ fixes │ │ results │ until │
│ │ reviews │ │ & run │ │ │ score ≥ 6 │
│ └──────────┘ │experiments│ └──────────┘ │
│ └──────────┘ │
│ │
│ State: REVIEW_STATE.json + AUTO_REVIEW.md │
│ Recovery: 24-hour window from persisted state │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Components: research-reviewer agent + run-experiment skill + analyze-results skill + monitor-experiment skill + novelty-check skill
Safety features:
/autor.paper-writing)"Turn my research narrative into a submission-ready PDF."
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ /autor.paper-writing │
│ │
│ paper-plan paper-figure paper-write │
│ (skill) (skill) (skill) │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Claims- │───▶│ Generate │────▶│ Section │──┐ │
│ │ Evidence │ │ figures, │ │ by │ │ │
│ │ Matrix │ │ tables │ │ section │ │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │ │
│ │ │
│ paper-compile paper-improver │ │
│ (skill) (agent) │ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ NARRATIVE_REPORT.md ──▶ paper/ (LaTeX + PDF) │ │
│ │ Template: templates/VENUE/ (from CLAUDE.md) │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Components: paper-plan skill + paper-figure skill + paper-write skill + paper-compile skill + paper-improver agent
Input: A NARRATIVE_REPORT.md describing the research.
Output: A submission-ready paper/ directory with LaTeX source, clean .bib, and compiled PDF.
Key features:
templates/VENUE/paper-improver agent runs 2 rounds of content review + format checkpdftotext-based precise check against venue page limitWhat
/paper-figurecan and cannot do: It auto-generates data-driven plots (training curves, bar charts, heatmaps) and comparison tables. It cannot generate architecture diagrams or pipeline figures — create those manually and place infigures/before running/paper-write.
paper-improver agent)After /autor.paper-writing generates the paper, the paper-improver agent runs 2 rounds of GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh content review + fix + recompile, plus a final format compliance check.
/autor.research-pipeline)Meta-pipeline: /autor.idea-discovery → (mandatory human gate) → implementation → /autor.auto-review-loop. Does NOT include paper-writing (run /autor.paper-writing separately after).
The mandatory human gate ensures you review and approve the selected idea before committing GPU time to full implementation.
| Skill | Description | Needs Codex (reviewer)? |
|---|---|---|
research-lit | Literature search: arXiv TeX sources, local PDFs, web search | No |
idea-creator | Generate and rank 8-12 research ideas given a direction | Yes |
novelty-check | Verify idea novelty against recent literature | Yes |
run-experiment | Deploy experiments to local (MPS/CUDA) or remote GPU | No |
monitor-experiment | Monitor running experiments, check progress, collect results | No |
analyze-results | Analyze results, compute statistics, generate insights | No |
paper-plan | Claims-evidence matrix + section outline + citation scaffolding | Yes |
paper-figure | Publication-quality matplotlib/seaborn plots with LaTeX snippets | Optional |
| Command | Composes | Description |
|---|---|---|
/autor.idea-discovery | research-lit → idea-creator → novelty-check → research-reviewer | Literature survey to validated, ranked ideas |
/autor.auto-review-loop | research-reviewer → fix → run-experiment → re-review (x4) | Autonomous review-fix iteration loop |
/autor.paper-writing | paper-plan → paper-figure → paper-write → paper-compile → paper-improver | Narrative report to submission-ready PDF |
/autor.research-pipeline | idea-discovery → human gate → implement → auto-review-loop | Full end-to-end research pipeline |
| Agent | Description | Model |
|---|---|---|
research-reviewer | Senior ML reviewer — multi-round critical feedback on ideas, papers, results | GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh via codex-bridge |
paper-improver | 2-round auto-improvement: review → fix → recompile. State via PAPER_IMPROVEMENT_STATE.json | GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh via codex-bridge |
npm install -g @openai/codex
codex auth login
Skills call Codex through codex-bridge/ (codex exec under a
bridge-owned CODEX_HOME; no MCP server needed — codex mcp-server was removed in Codex 0.154).
Verify with codex-bridge/bin/codex-bridge selftest.latexmk and pdfinfo:
# macOS
brew install --cask mactex # or: brew install basictex
brew install poppler # provides pdfinfo
# Ubuntu/Debian
sudo apt install texlive-full latexmk poppler-utils
# Verify
latexmk --version && pdfinfo -v
If you only need idea discovery + auto review, LaTeX is not required.
git clone https://github.com/llv23/AutoResearchWithEyes.git
cd AutoResearchWithEyes
| Method | Persistent | In-place (no cache copy) | Works in VSCode extension |
|---|---|---|---|
--plugin-dir | ❌ session only | ✅ | ❌ |
Shell alias wrapping --plugin-dir | ✅ (via shell) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Marketplace install | ✅ | ❌ (cached) | ✅ |
Option A: Use from project directory (recommended)
Simply run claude from the repo. Claude Code auto-discovers skills from skills/, commands from commands/, and agents from agents/:
cd AutoResearchWithEyes
claude
Option B: Load as a plugin from any directory
Use --plugin-dir to load the plugin for a session without being in the repo:
claude --plugin-dir /path/to/AutoResearchWithEyes
Option C: Install skills globally
Copy skills to your user directory so they're available from any project:
cp -r skills/* ~/.claude/skills/
cp -r commands/* ~/.claude/commands/
Copied skills still call the reviewer through this repo's codex-bridge/bin/codex-bridge, so keep the clone in place.
Option D: Symbolic Installation
Install as a Claude Code plugin via a local marketplace symlink, so skills and commands are available from any directory without --plugin-dir. Changes to the source repo are picked up automatically — no reinstall needed.
# 1. Create the marketplace directory structure
mkdir -p ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/autor-marketplace/.claude-plugin
# 2. Symlink the plugin into the marketplace
ln -s /path/to/AutoResearchWithEyes \
~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/autor-marketplace/auto-research-with-eyes
# 3. Create the marketplace manifest
cat > ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/autor-marketplace/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json << 'EOF'
{
"name": "autor-marketplace",
"owner": {
"name": "your-username"
},
"plugins": [
{
"name": "auto-research-with-eyes",
"description": "Autonomous ML research pipeline: idea discovery, experiment, review, paper writing",
"source": "./auto-research-with-eyes",
"category": "research"
}
]
}
EOF
Note: The plugin source must contain
.claude-plugin/plugin.json(already included in this repo).
# 4. Register the marketplace in known_marketplaces.json
# Add (or merge) this entry into ~/.claude/plugins/known_marketplaces.json:
python3 -c "
import json, os, pathlib
path = pathlib.Path(os.path.expanduser('~/.claude/plugins/known_marketplaces.json'))
data = json.loads(path.read_text()) if path.exists() else {}
data['autor-marketplace'] = {
'source': {'source': 'directory', 'path': os.path.expanduser('~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/autor-marketplace')},
'installLocation': os.path.expanduser('~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/autor-marketplace'),
'lastUpdated': '$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.000Z)'
}
path.write_text(json.dumps(data, indent=2) + '\n')
print('✓ Registered autor-marketplace')
"
# 5. Enable the plugin in settings.json
# Add this to the "enabledPlugins" object in ~/.claude/settings.json:
python3 -c "
import json, os, pathlib
path = pathlib.Path(os.path.expanduser('~/.claude/settings.json'))
data = json.loads(path.read_text()) if path.exists() else {}
data.setdefault('enabledPlugins', {})['auto-research-with-eyes@autor-marketplace'] = True
path.write_text(json.dumps(data, indent=2) + '\n')
print('✓ Enabled auto-research-with-eyes@autor-marketplace')
"
# 6. Verify — restart Claude Code and check the plugin loads
claude
# Then run: /autor.idea-discovery --help
~/.claude/plugins/
├── known_marketplaces.json # ← entry added in step 4
└── marketplaces/
└── autor-marketplace/
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── marketplace.json # ← created in step 3
└── auto-research-with-eyes # ← symlink to your clone (step 2)
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── plugin.json # (in the repo)
├── skills/
├── commands/
├── agents/
└── ...
~/.claude/settings.json # ← enabledPlugins entry added in step 5
Tip: Since the marketplace entry is a symlink,
git pullin the source repo automatically updates the plugin — no reinstall needed. To uninstall, remove the symlink and the corresponding entries fromknown_marketplaces.jsonandsettings.json.
Templates are not bundled — download the official author kit for your target venue:
| Venue | Place files in | Page limit |
|---|---|---|
| ICLR 2026 | templates/iclr2026/ | 9 pages |
| NeurIPS 2026 | templates/neurips2026/ | 9 pages |
| ICML 2026 | templates/icml2026/ | 8 pages |
Each templates/<venue>/README.md has specific download instructions.
Custom venue: Create templates/<venue-name>/, add style files, update VENUE and page limit in CLAUDE.md.
# Commands (workflow orchestrators) — accept plain text or file paths
> /autor.idea-discovery "your research direction" # Workflow 1 (plain text)
> /autor.idea-discovery tests/0_idea_discovery.md # Workflow 1 (from spec file)
> /autor.auto-review-loop "your paper topic" # Workflow 2
> /autor.paper-writing "NARRATIVE_REPORT.md" # Workflow 3
> /autor.research-pipeline "your research direction" # Full pipeline
# Individual skills — also accept file paths
> /research-lit "topic" # just literature survey
> /research-lit path/to/spec.md # literature survey from spec file
> /idea-creator "topic" # just brainstorm
> /novelty-check "specific idea" # just novelty verification
> /run-experiment train.py --lr 1e-4 --epochs 100
> /analyze-results figures/*.json
> /monitor-experiment server5
> /paper-plan "NARRATIVE_REPORT.md" # just outline
> /paper-compile "paper/" # just compile
To run without permission prompts, add to .claude/settings.local.json:
{
"permissions": {
"allow": [
"Bash(/path/to/AutoResearchWithEyes/codex-bridge/bin/codex-bridge:*)",
"Write",
"Edit",
"Skill(auto-review-loop)"
]
}
}
When GPT-5.6 Sol says "run an ablation study", Claude Code writes the script and deploys it to your GPU server. Add your server info to your project's CLAUDE.md:
## Remote Server
- SSH: `ssh my-gpu-server` (key-based auth, no password)
- GPU: 4x A100
- Conda env: `research` (Python 3.10 + PyTorch)
- Activate: `eval "$(/opt/conda/bin/conda shell.bash hook)" && conda activate research`
- Code directory: `/home/user/experiments/`
- Use `screen` for background jobs: `screen -dmS exp0 bash -c '...'`
No server? Review and rewriting skills work without GPU access. Experiment-related fixes will be flagged for manual follow-up.
All constants live in CLAUDE.md at the repo root. Edit to customize:
| Constant | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
REVIEWER_MODEL | gpt-5.6-sol | Model used via codex-bridge |
PILOT_MAX_HOURS | 2 | Max hours per pilot idea |
PILOT_TIMEOUT_HOURS | 3 | Hard timeout for pilots |
MAX_PILOT_IDEAS | 3 | Ideas piloted in parallel |
MAX_TOTAL_GPU_HOURS | 8 | Total GPU budget |
MAX_ROUNDS | 4 | Review-fix iterations |
POSITIVE_THRESHOLD | >= 6/10 | Score to pass review |
AUTO_PROCEED | true | Auto-proceed at checkpoints |
MAX_IMPROVEMENT_ROUNDS | 2 | Paper improvement iterations |
COMPILER | latexmk | LaTeX build tool |
ENGINE | pdflatex | LaTeX engine |
MAX_COMPILE_ATTEMPTS | 3 | Compilation retries |
VENUE | iclr2026 | Target venue |
TEMPLATE_DIR | templates/ | Template base directory |
Override per-invocation with inline arguments:
/autor.idea-discovery "topic" -- pilot budget: 4h, max ideas: 5
/autor.paper-writing "NARRATIVE_REPORT.md" -- venue: neurips2026, engine: xelatex
Don't have Claude / OpenAI API? Swap in other models — same cross-model architecture, different providers.
codex-bridge's approval gate calls
claude -p, which follows the executor'sANTHROPIC_BASE_URL; setCODEX_BRIDGE_APPROVER_MODELto a model that provider serves (e.g.glm-4.7), otherwise every gated command is denied (fail closed). Alt B'sCODEX_*reviewer variables are passed through to Codex unchanged but have not been re-verified with codex-bridge.
| Role | Default | Alt A: GLM + GPT | Alt B: GLM + MiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executor (Claude Code) | Claude Fable 5 | GLM-5 (ZhiPu API) | GLM-5 (ZhiPu API) |
| Reviewer (codex-bridge) | GPT-5.6 Sol | GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI API) | MiniMax-M2.5 (MiniMax API) |
| Need OpenAI API? | Yes | Yes | No |
{
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN": "your_zai_api_key",
"ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL": "https://api.z.ai/api/anthropic",
"API_TIMEOUT_MS": "3000000",
"ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL": "glm-4.5-air",
"ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL": "glm-4.7",
"ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL": "glm-5"
}
}
{
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN": "your_zai_api_key",
"ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL": "https://api.z.ai/api/anthropic",
"API_TIMEOUT_MS": "3000000",
"ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL": "glm-4.5-air",
"ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL": "glm-4.7",
"ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL": "glm-5",
"CODEX_API_KEY": "your_minimax_api_key",
"CODEX_API_BASE": "https://api.minimax.chat/v1/",
"CODEX_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5"
}
}
AUTO_PROCEED=false to pause at each decision point
@misc{autoresearchwitheyes,
author = {Chris Yuhao Liu, Lei Ding},
title = {AutoResearchWithEyes: Human-in-the-loop autonomous research with LLM agents},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/llv22/AutoResearchWithEyes}},
note = {GitHub repository}
}
@misc{yang2026aris,
author = {Yang, Ruofeng and Li, Yongcan and Li, Shuai},
title = {ARIS: Fully Autonomous Research via Adversarial Multi-Agent Collaboration},
year = {2026},
organization = {GitHub},
url = {https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep},
}
@misc{karpathy2026autoresearch,
author = {Andrej Karpathy},
title = {autoresearch: AI agents running research on single-GPU nanochat training automatically},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/karpathy/autoresearch}},
note = {GitHub repository}
}
Core Infrastructure
Paper Writing Inspiration
Community
By Chris Yuhao Liu, Lei Ding(Orlando) 2026@March.
paper-write| Section-by-section LaTeX generation with venue templates |
| Yes |
paper-compile | Compile LaTeX to PDF, auto-fix errors, submission readiness check | No |